
Day three of the PDC World Championship concludes with four ties that feature one PDC world champion, one BDO world champion and a BDO world finalist. All eyes will be on Gary Anderson, but Joe Cullen and Jelle Klaasen will be under the spotlight as they seek to overcome difficult obstacles and reach the second round.
ADVERTISEMENT
Jeff Smith vs Luke Humphries (Prelim)
Jeff Smith has some decent world championship calibre. The Canadian has appeared in three of them at the Lakeside, and his worst showing was in reaching the last 16 back in January. Smith has caused some controversy by opting out of a return to Frimley Green, however, and faces a much tougher challenge in the PDC's premier event.
Looking to suppress the Silencer is Luke Humphries, a 22-year-old who goes into the World Championships a relative unknown. Keen observers of floor darts have been impressed by the Berkshire thrower, who finished top of the Development Tour rankings after winning five events. Hopefully, Humphries will have watched Ted Evetts' opening night showing closely, and accounted for the effect of big stage nerves.
Looking to suppress the Silencer is Luke Humphries, a 22-year-old who goes into the World Championships a relative unknown. Keen observers of floor darts have been impressed by the Berkshire thrower, who finished top of the Development Tour rankings after winning five events. Hopefully, Humphries will have watched Ted Evetts' opening night showing closely, and accounted for the effect of big stage nerves.
Joe Cullen vs Jermaine Wattimena
On his day, there are few players as fun to watch as Joe Cullen. Unfortunately, it isn't clear to anyone when his day is likely to be - even Cullen himself. The 28-year-old from Bradford has bags of natural talent, but is still somewhat lacking in composure or consistency. That said, it is widely agreed that Cullen is due a major breakthrough sooner or later. A breakthrough of sorts was made last year at the Ally Pally, with Cullen beating Corey Cadby to win in the first round for the first time in seven attempts. He averaged over 100 in a thrilling tie, but that form left him in a second round humbling at the hands of Adrian Lewis. The question isn't just what Cullen can achieve against Wattimena, but if he can follow up one good performance with another.
The good news for Wattimena is that he has already matched his best showing at a Worlds. The next step for the Dutchman is getting through the first round. Wattimena impressed in 6-0 and 6-3 wins over Keegan Brown and Mickey Mansell respectively at the Players Championship finals, but his composure left him in a decider against Steve Beaton. Both know where the treble bed is. It may just be that the calmest player on the day wins.
The good news for Wattimena is that he has already matched his best showing at a Worlds. The next step for the Dutchman is getting through the first round. Wattimena impressed in 6-0 and 6-3 wins over Keegan Brown and Mickey Mansell respectively at the Players Championship finals, but his composure left him in a decider against Steve Beaton. Both know where the treble bed is. It may just be that the calmest player on the day wins.
Jelle Klaasen vs Jan Dekker
When you win the World Championship at the very first attempt, there isn't really anywhere to go but down. That has been the case for Jelle Klaasen, whose stunning 2006 BDO title will likely be the only time he is crowned the world's best. Yet the target is not necessarily victory, but putting on a good enough run to make the Premier League selectors think twice. Reaching the semi-finals in 2016 had that very effect. Klaasen is the sort of player who can explode into life at any time. He might need to if he wants to beat Jan Dekker.
Few would have given 'Double' Dekker any hope of winning a tie like this before the Players Championship. Yet the Dutchman's form in Minehead will give him plenty of confidence as he takes on his compatriot a couple of hundred miles to the east of Butlins. Neither Michael Smith, Simon Whitlock nor Peter Jacques could deal with Dekker's clinical finishing, and even the irrepressible Michael van Gerwen was pushed all the way before a late surge. Klaasen will feel he should win this, but better be prepared for a battle.
Few would have given 'Double' Dekker any hope of winning a tie like this before the Players Championship. Yet the Dutchman's form in Minehead will give him plenty of confidence as he takes on his compatriot a couple of hundred miles to the east of Butlins. Neither Michael Smith, Simon Whitlock nor Peter Jacques could deal with Dekker's clinical finishing, and even the irrepressible Michael van Gerwen was pushed all the way before a late surge. Klaasen will feel he should win this, but better be prepared for a battle.
Gary Anderson vs Smith/Humphries
ADVERTISEMENT
Gary Anderson appearing in the World Championship final has become a Christmas tradition. He's much like brussels sprouts on a plate; you may or may not have asked for him to be there, yet there he is. The 2015 and 2016 champion's bid to make it three world titles in a row was ended in style by Michael van Gerwen. He'll be back for more though, even if he has to overcome both Phil Taylor and Peter Wright to make the final. A mixture of injury and family matters have hampered his World Championship preparation somewhat, but Anderson is one of those enviable talents who can pick up his darts and start where he left off. Anderson is used to being at least in the semi-finals of any given event. It is unlikely Jeff Smith or Luke Humphries will have the opportunity to sink the Flying Scotsman that Mickey Mansell was afforded at the Players Championship finals. Victory in this one results in a meeting with one of Mark Webster, Kai Fan Leung or the evergreen Paul Lim.

Photo: Lawrence Lustig/PDC
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026





