"Disappointed that people thought it was between me and Nathan": Stephen Bunting says Premier League spot was deserved, vows to ditch People's Champion moniker
PDC
Stephen Bunting opened his 2026 Bahrain Darts Masters campaign with a 6–2 victory over Ryusei Azemoto, producing a performance that was comfortable for long spells before a brief nervous finish.
ADVERTISEMENT
The former world championship semi-finalist looked in control for most of the contest, but admitted afterwards that complacency crept in as he neared the finish line. “Just a bit of complacency, to be honest,” Bunting said post match to the media. “I felt great throughout the game and felt in control, but I was just eager to get over the line and that put a bit of pressure on myself. I know I can’t do that again. You can afford to do it when you’re 5–1 up, but you can’t do that tomorrow when you’re playing Michael van Gerwen.”
Bunting was the last of the PDC representatives to take to the stage, with the added pressure of knowing every other seed had already progressed. “Yeah, of course it does make it harder. All eyes are on me then, aren’t they? No one wants to lose, especially when everyone else has won. But I also knew I wanted to put a performance in. I felt like I played well in most patches and, like you said, I was just a bit hesitant getting over the line. I’m happy with the win.”
The victory marked another step in what Bunting hopes will be a season where strong performances finally convert into consistent results. Despite finishing last year in impressive form statistically, the big moments did not always go his way. “There were a lot of things going on that people didn’t see. I’m not one to make excuses, so I kept them to myself. But I feel fresh, I feel great going into this season. I’m really looking forward to being back in the Premier League. That alone is massive for confidence. I’m still world number seven. I know I’ve dropped a few places, but there are targets there to get back into the top four.”
A key part of Bunting’s reset has been addressing how heavily he allowed rankings pressure to affect him during the latter stages of last year. “Yeah, 100%. Like the others, I worried about that top-four spot for nine months of the year and it affected me on the oche and off it as well. I was looking at the rankings every single day. I know how good I am, but I need to stay away from rankings and just concentrate on my game. I’m one of the best players in the world and I need to focus on darts rather than earnings, money and all that stuff.”
Bunting also reflected on the late notice of his Premier League inclusion, which he described as emotional given his previous experience in the tournament. “I was disappointed that people thought it was between me and Nathan,” he said. “I believe I deserved to be in. I’m world number seven, I won six tournaments last year and reached around ten finals. I’ve got a great fan base and a great walk-on. People don’t talk about walk-ons, but I honestly believe I deserve to be there, and I’m going to show everyone that I do.”
Grateful to be back in Premier League and social media criticism
ADVERTISEMENT
The Premier League call-up carried extra weight for Bunting, who was dropped from the competition over a decade ago and admits it affected him deeply. “It really killed me when I got dropped 11 years ago. It affected me for years. Two or three years after that, I was really down and almost looking to pack it in. I’m just thankful that the PDC saw the opportunity to put me back in. I’m grateful, and I want to repay their faith with great performances and a lot of wins.”
Rather than feeling weighed down by expectation, Bunting insists the pressure is off this time around. “I think the pressure is off, to be honest. I lost the first eight games last year and that’s not going to happen again, I can assure you of that. My aim this year is to make the majors my ultimate focus. I’m going to pull back a bit from exhibitions, stay fresh for the tour and give everything to it. The Premier League means everything to me.”
Behind the scenes, Bunting has also made changes to protect his mindset, including stepping further away from social media and external noise. “I’ve already got people looking after my social media, so I rarely see the negatives. The ‘people’s champion’ stuff was tongue-in-cheek and maybe a mistake, but I’ll never mention it again. It’s all about performances now. We’ve got one of the greatest fan bases in the world and you’ve seen it again here in Bahrain. They’re a massive part of what I’m able to do.”
Physically, Bunting says he feels sharper than he has in some time, though he is keeping the details of his preparation close to his chest. “I don’t want to give anyone the ammunition to copy what I’m doing,” he smiled. “But I feel fitter, more awake, and I feel really good stepping onto the oche now. I’ve lost a bit of timber and I’ve got a great mental team behind me. Without my family, my management, my sponsors and my fans, I’d probably have packed it in a long time ago. Their faith keeps me going.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Reflecting on last year’s Premier League campaign, Bunting believes familiarity will be a major advantage this time around. “It felt like starting a new school last year. You’re nervous, you don’t know what to expect. Playing week in, week out in front of 10–12,000 is very different to what we’re used to. This year I know exactly what to expect. I’m eager, I’m raring to go, and I can’t wait. I’ve got a big year ahead of me and I want to repay that faith with great performances – and hopefully more than one win.”
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026