Double debut success in Ried: Patrick Reisenegger claims first NEXT-GEN title while Daniel Klose dominates historic 170 tournament
PDC
With a debut winner on Saturday and a memorable final on Sunday, PDC Europe’s NEXT GEN weekend in Ried im Innkreis came to a close. While Austria’s Patrick Reisenegger lifted his first title on the tour, Daniel Klose made a powerful statement at the inaugural 170 tournament. The German gave the field no chance and capped his dominant display with a final win without dropping a leg.
ADVERTISEMENT
Saturday in Ried im Innkreis was all about the seventh event of the PDC Europe NEXT GEN 2026 season. The format followed an “FA Cup” structure, with a group stage leading into a knockout phase. The day’s biggest success went to Austria’s Patrick Reisenegger, who claimed the first NEXT GEN title of his career.
Reisenegger celebrates first NEXT GEN title
Reisenegger opened the knockouts with a 4-1 win over Jakob Kilger before springing the first upset as early as round two. Against German top player Liam Maendl-Lawrance, the Austrian held his nerve in a tense decider to edge it 4-3.
Reisenegger then maintained his impressive run with a commanding 4-1 victory over Pascal Grummich. In the subsequent clash with German top talent Jarod Becker, he once again showed steel and moved on with another 4-3 success.
The Austrian could not be stopped in the quarterfinals either. He beat Germany’s Mika Donnevert 5-2 before delivering one of his best performances of the tournament in the semifinals against Oliver Keßler. Reisenegger gave his opponent no chance in a clear 5-0 win to seal his place in the final.
There he faced a high-profile opponent in René Eidams. The German World Championship cult hero had reached the final of a NEXT GEN event for the second time in a row but fell short again. Reisenegger crowned his strong tournament with a 6-4 victory and celebrated the first NEXT GEN title of his career.
ADVERTISEMENT
Klose impresses at inaugural 170-format tournament
Sunday brought a first in PDC Europe NEXT GEN history with Event 8. For the first time, a tournament was staged in the innovative “170” format. Unlike the usual setup, each leg did not start at 501 but at just 170 points, underlining the series’ experimental character.
From the outset, one of Germany’s most experienced players, Daniel Klose, made striking use of the new format. The German began the knockouts with a clear 8-1 win over compatriot Adrian Eckert and followed it up with a 10-6 victory against Dennis Mayer.
Klose continued to dominate in the following rounds. He swept past Austria’s Patrick Tringler 10-3 before also easing past Leon Ebmeier 10-2 in the last 16.
In the quarterfinals, Klose gave German stalwart Marcel Hausotter no chance in a 10-3 win, underlining his strong form once more. The German then booked his place in the final with a composed 10-4 victory over Tim Scholz.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the final, Klose put the seal on his outstanding display. With a superb performance, he left Jaimy van de Weerd no openings and won the decider 11-0. That secured not only the title at the first NEXT GEN tournament in the new 170 format, but also his third tournament win of the current season.
Daniel Klose won the first NEXT GEN tournament in the new 170 format with an impressive campaign and an 11-0 victory in the final.
Results NEXT GEN Event 7
| Player 1 | Average | Legs | VS | Legs | Average | Player 2 |
| Final | ||||||
| Patrick Reisenegger | 80.34 | 6 | VS | 4 | 78.16 | René Eidams |
| Semifinals | ||||||
| Patrick Reisenegger | 86.38 | 5 | VS | 0 | 80.15 | Oliver Keßler |
| René Eidams | 89.27 | 5 | VS | 4 | 95.24 | Daniel Klose |
| Quarterfinals | ||||||
| Oliver Keßler | 77.64 | 5 | VS | 2 | 79.48 | Pascal Wirotius |
| Daniel Klose | 91.40 | 5 | VS | 1 | 85.75 | Daniel Neubauer |
| Patrick Reisenegger | 81.45 | 5 | VS | 2 | 72.12 | Mika Donnevert |
| René Eidams | 84.26 | 5 | VS | 3 | 71.29 | Merlin Nicolaus |
Results NEXT GEN Event 8
ADVERTISEMENT
| Player 1 | Legs | VS | Legs | Player 2 |
| Final | ||||
| Daniel Klose | 11 | VS | 0 | Jaimy van de Weerd |
| Semifinals | ||||
| Daniel Klose | 10 | VS | 4 | Tim Scholz |
| Jaimy van de Weerd | 10 | VS | 5 | Carsten Hoffmann |
| Quarterfinals | ||||
| Daniel Klose | 10 | VS | 3 | Marcel Hausotter |
| Carsten Hoffmann | 10 | VS | 8 | Kimi Seemann |
| Tim Scholz | 10 | VS | 6 | Kevin Troppmann |
| Jaimy van de Weerd | 10 | VS | 5 | Mika Donnevert |
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026
- I agree,I can't believe the lack of coverage of this sad loss. Always enjoyed watching him,but I guess now it's all about littler,well it seems that way. Darts has sadly lost a good manrick6717-10-2026
- In the absence of a report regarding the death of Stefan Lord, I'll assist. An excellent player in the late 70s and early 80s, he actually won the now defunct 3rd place match at two World Championships and a couple of the News of the World Championships. A fabulous player and easily the best Swedish player ever. Rest peacefully Stefan.richieburnettrocks16-10-2026
- Joking aside, it is the second most watched sport on sky (more than golf, F1 etc) behind football only, and in participation is second to only football and swimming. It doesn't get the attention or sponsorship of "bigger" sports because it's not as sexy, but it's right up there.BandB13-10-2026