"Haven’t really saved any money, so I have to do it now"– 55-year-old Andrew Gilding making up for 'misspent youth'
PDC
At 55, Andrew Gilding continues to astonish himself and the darts world. The Englishman, nicknamed “Goldfinger,” produced one of the finest performances of his career at the Poland Darts Open. With an impressive 106.55 average, his highest ever on a European Tour stage, he launched his campaign in convincing fashion, and that after straining a muscle in his leg just before his walk-on.
ADVERTISEMENT
Gilding was too strong for Jeffrey de Graaf in the opening round, winning 6–3. “Yeah, I’m not sure where that came from. Just before I did the walk-on in the practice room, I pulled a muscle in my leg, so I was in a bit of pain. I thought, ‘Oh, it’s going to affect me a bit,’ but obviously it didn’t," he said to Tungsten Tales.
It typifies the down-to-earth Brit, who rarely shouts from the rooftops. Even after a top display, he remains surprised by his own level.
Muscle pain and scoring surge
Those who know Gilding understand he doesn’t complain easily. Still, he admitted the injury troubled him. “Yeah, it’s a little bit sore, but I’ll keep it if I need to, if I play like that.”
Little discomfort was visible on stage. His scoring power was impressive, his doubles landed at the right moments, and his pace was characteristically determined. The average he posted ranks among the highest he has ever thrown on a European Tour stage. “It must be my biggest average, I’m sure.”
Read also
Asked whether he had seen this level coming in practice, his answer was telling: “Not at all. Not at all. I never expect much with energy like that anyway.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The importance of the European Tour
For Gilding, the European Tour events are hugely important right now. The prize money and ranking points are crucial for qualification for televised tournaments and majors. Last year he even reached a final on this circuit.
“At the moment, they’re very important because I’m right on the cusp of qualifying for these. A couple of days ago, I had to enter a qualifier for these and didn’t have any luck. This win today has definitely improved my chances.”
The qualifiers are known to be gruelling: long days, many matches, little margin for error. “It’s been a while since I had to enter a qualifier. I’d forgotten how rough they are because you’ve got a long day. I’ll just try and keep automatic qualification going.”
His goal is clear: secure automatic qualification and avoid the draining preliminaries.
ADVERTISEMENT
A late bloomer with hunger
During the last World Championship, Gilding spoke about his status as a late bloomer. At 55, he still stands among the world’s best and regularly leaves players decades younger in his wake.
“No, I misspent years. There’s a lot to do with it. I haven’t really saved any money, so I have to do it now.”
That remark says a lot about his motivation. While some of his peers wind down their careers, Gilding seems to have found a second wind.
ADVERTISEMENT
When asked how many European Tour wins it would take to buy the bungalow next door, he replied: “What is it now, £35,000 to the winner? Probably about ten wins.” He added earlier that he probably wouldn’t have done it anyway and would “probably put it in a pension or something.”
A stuttering start
Remarkably, his match began far from convincingly. De Graaf flew out of the blocks and put Gilding under immediate pressure.
“What went through my head was that Geoffrey really played well to start with, so I don’t think I did much wrong. I don’t think I thought about it at all. I thought, ‘He’s going to beat me 6–0,’ that’s what I thought.”
No panic, no drastic changes, just carrying on and waiting for chances. And they came. As the match progressed, the momentum shifted. Gilding found his rhythm, his trebles landed more consistently, and his experience told.
ADVERTISEMENT
Andrew Gilding is the current world number 31
The target: the Euros and the stage
What is the big goal for this season? “The aim for me this year is just to get into the qualification spots for these Euros. That’s where the money is and that’s how you get onto the TV tournaments.”
It is a clear strategy: consistency above all. He was also asked whether, in this form, he could win another big TV title. His answer was brief and emphatic: “If I keep that up, yeah.”
Kraków as a backdrop
ADVERTISEMENT
The tournament took place in Kraków, a city that impressed the Englishman. “The atmosphere is fantastic. The noise, like I said on stage, when I was backstage, I couldn’t believe it. Then when I came out, there were that many people in the crowd making all that noise. That’s Kraków, I think it’s a beautiful city. Amazing buildings, the scenery and the snow. I love the snow.”
Although he wasn’t a home favourite, he received noticeable support. “Yeah, there were a few people chanting and calling my name, so I gave them a quick thumbs up.”
On the culinary front, he kept it simple. “No, I had a Chinese last night. But there were some Chinese dumplings, so that’s fairly Polish!”
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 25visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026