Beau Greaves beats three former world champions on her way to a historic title: "To beat the players I’ve beaten, like Gary Anderson, I couldn’t believe it"
PDC
Beau Greaves admitted she was in disbelief after becoming the first woman to win a PDC Pro Tour title, describing the moment as one of the proudest achievements of her career.
ADVERTISEMENT
The 22-year-old produced a stunning run to claim Players Championship 11, defeating three former world champions along the way, including Michael Smith in the final, but even she struggled to process what she had achieved.
She opened her day by seeing off Aden Kirk 6-4 before sealing victory over Thomas Lovely. Then it was victory over Jeffrey Sparidaans and an in-form Karel Sedlacek to reach a third consecutive Players Championship Quarter-Final.
She then produced a 102.56 average to edge past Rob Cross who averaged almost 106 in defeat. Then it was a sensational thrashing of Gary Anderson 7-1 with a 105 average before then setting up the showdown with Smith where she came from 2-0 down to rattle off five legs on the spin before going onto seal it.
“I don’t know, when I was 5-6 up, I started to think about it and it caught up to me,” Greaves said. “I don’t know whether I was thinking about being the first woman to do it, but I honestly can’t believe it. I can’t believe I took that out at the end. “I’ve had a great year, but I never thought I’d win one of these, never ever.”
Out of reach despite brilliance elsewhere
Despite her growing list of titles across other circuits, Greaves insisted this milestone had always felt out of reach. “No, not at all,” she said, when asked if she believed she could win a Pro Tour event. “I had a good run last week and I said to my lad sitting at the table that I didn’t even feel like I’d played that well, but I was still getting results. “Today I played really well. I don’t even know how to describe it, I’m just so happy. I can’t describe the way I feel. “To win on the Development Tour is so hard, and now to win on this, it’s unbelievable. I feel so proud of myself because I was struggling at the start of the year, really struggling.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Greaves’ triumph came after several demanding days of competition, having also competed on the Development Tour earlier in the weekend, including hitting a nine-darter against Charlie Manby. “I played Friday and Saturday on the Development Tour. I had some decent games, I hit a nine-darter against Charlie Manby, but I also had some bad games,” she explained. “I took Sunday off to feel fresh, and I never thought I’d come in today and win this. I know I’ve got the ability and the talent, but to beat the players I’ve beaten, like Gary Anderson, I couldn’t believe it.
Beau Greaves in disbelief at what she has achieved.
“Even beating Michael, I don’t know what’s happening. I’m beating players I’ve watched growing up. It’s just amazing. “I feel really proud of myself to win one of these. I never thought I would. I don’t know why I’m crying so much, but I’m just really happy and really proud. Hopefully I can kick on and keep doing it.”
One of the defining moments of her run came in a dramatic victory over Rob Cross, where Greaves held her nerve under sustained pressure.
“He missed it a few times,” she said of Cross’ attempts at the bullseye. “Every time I looked back, he was in the treble. “It’s funny because Rob beat me 6-0 the last time we played, so when I got a leg, I thought maybe. But I knew I was playing well and putting pressure on him. “My finishing has been really good, but that 142 checkout, I’m in disbelief. I don’t usually do that. To do it in that moment is just amazing.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Mindset fuels success
Greaves believes her mindset played a key role in her success, highlighting the importance of confidence and enjoyment throughout the day. “I’ve just really enjoyed every game I’ve played today. I’ve played well and enjoyed every moment.
Maybe this is just the start, I don’t know,” she said. “I’ve done really well on other tours, but to win one of these is unbelievable. I’m still in shock, I don’t think it’ll sink in until tomorrow. “I know I’ve got the talent, but believing in yourself and having confidence is a big thing. Today I had that confidence, and I was enjoying it, that’s probably been the main factor. “Honestly, aside from winning Lakeside, this is probably my best achievement ever. Hopefully I can kick on and do well on TV as well.”
For Greaves, already a prolific winner across multiple formats, this latest success could mark the beginning of an even bigger breakthrough on the sport’s biggest stage. For now, though, the history-maker is simply trying to take it all in.
ADVERTISEMENT
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026