"I wasn't good enough, not because I didn't get on with Peter Manley": Glen Durrant resigns from PDPA role amid frustrations but refuses to blame others
PDC
According to former professional player and current commentator Glen Durrant, the world of darts is experiencing one of the most fascinating periods in the sport's modern history.
ADVERTISEMENT
With the emergence of Luke Littler and the continued dominance of Luke Humphries, the Englishman describes the current era as a brilliant, but also slightly dizzying evolution of professional darts. Durrant also reflected on his recent departure from the Professional Darts Players Association.
Humphries is the complete package
Durrant believes Luke Humphries is currently the most complete player in the world. For Durrant, Humphries' development highlights the importance of the mental side of elite darts. He believes it was crucial that Humphries finally managed to beat Luke Littler in a major final after losing several deciding-leg encounters.
"Luke Humphries right now looks to be the best player in the world. He'll have been disappointed not to win the Premier League, but from the guy who was trialling different throws and slowing everything down, to see him playing like he is now," he said to Online Darts.
Read also
"For me, he goes into the World Matchplay as favourite. He's fit, he's hungry and he wants to win titles again."
"We talk about mentality and just getting that win. Winning in New York is big. They're not going over there for an exhibition, they want to win.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I wax lyrical about Luke Littler because I think he's something I've probably never seen before in the flesh.
"Don't forget, I didn't really see Phil Taylor at his best apart from on TV. During Michael van Gerwen's dominant era I was still in the BDO. To watch what Luke Littler is doing right now is sensational. But we need someone to challenge him and, right now, that seems to be Luke Humphries."
According to Durrant, the rivalry between Littler and Humphries is exactly what the sport needs.
"We are so blessed. I'm grassroots now. I do a lot of coaching. Whether it's academy volunteers or youngsters inspired by Luke Littler, those two are making a massive difference—not just to the professional game but to grassroots darts.
"You go to the academies and they're bursting. Why? Because of what's happening in the game right now. Luke Littler and Luke Humphries are demonstrating everything we need to showcase our sport."
ADVERTISEMENT
Darts is becoming a global entertainment product
Durrant believes darts has now become a truly global sport, driven largely by commercial expansion and international broadcasting deals. He pointed to the sport's growing presence in the United States and its partnership with major broadcasters.
"People ask if I wish I'd played in this era. Of course I do! But we're just enjoying it while we can. There were over 5,000 people in New York and it's only going to get bigger.
"It's growing because we've got fantastic players. It's an entertainment business as well and we're doing that fantastically well. The two Lukes are certainly playing their part."
ADVERTISEMENT
According to Durrant, modern darts has evolved into a hybrid of sport and entertainment. "I was Mr Mesmeric. I was Mr Robotic! You don't think about entertaining when you're playing.
"But Luke Littler is having fun up there. The crowd interaction, the reactions—it's great to see. It's difficult in the moment trying to think I want to win the game as well, but they're letting the darts do the talking. Staggering averages. Massive finishes."
A changing generation
With the World Matchplay approaching, Durrant sees a clear shift in the sport's hierarchy. Established names such as Peter Wright, Raymond van Barneveld, Michael Smith and Dave Chisnall are increasingly finding themselves outside the biggest tournaments, while emerging players such as Wessel Nijman continue to rise.
"You asked me at Ally Pally if there was someone coming through and I said Wessel Nijman. If he can transfer his floor form to the stage, he's magnificent.
ADVERTISEMENT
"To see Dave Chisnall, Michael Smith and Peter Wright (potentially not there)... I don't get any satisfaction about them not being there. But the players coming through. Players like Cameron Menzies."
"There does seem to be that gap around the qualification places now. We'll all be watching. There are so many young players coming through."
Michael Smith is unlikely to qualify even if he wins both ProTours this week and Durrant say it's staggering but it also shows the place darts is in right now.
"I was looking at Michael Smith because I think when he's winning, the game's in a better place. Unless I've got my numbers wrong, even if he won both ProTours, he still doesn't qualify. That's staggering.
"The cream will always rise to the top, but every year we say the World Matchplay is the best 32 players it's ever been."
ADVERTISEMENT

Michael Smith is outside the world’s top 32 for the first time since 2013
But he also spoke on Raymond van Barneveld and Peter Wright with no expectation from Durrant that either will recount their highest heights ever again.
"Barney's legacy is there. He's still extremely busy on the exhibition circuit and we've had that retirement from him already. Peter is a different animal. From the guy who changes darts every time to the guy who still says he can win the World Championship.
"Remember when I played, I was down and out. The reality is there though. Every time Peter plays a ProTour I'm looking at his averages. It's not easy. When you're in your 50s your body changes. It's hard. I don't expect Barney or Peter Wright to get back to the upper echelons of darts."
Concerns over the modern schedule
ADVERTISEMENT
One of the major discussion points was the increasingly crowded darts calendar. More players are choosing to skip Pro Tour and European Tour events, something Durrant admits worries him.
"Surprised? No. But the game needs them to be on the Euro Tour. If you're going to Leverkusen next week you want to see Littler, Humphries and Price.
"But just the way the diary is right now, a lot of the players are realising that they've got the opportunity not to go to these competitions and that's got to be corrected somehow. I know what it's like being away for four days. Chris Dobey showed me his diary for July, August and September and it's staggering. You're barely at home. Players are choosing not to go away, there needs to be a solution."
Surprise departure from PDPA
Perhaps the most revealing part of the interview came when Durrant discussed his departure from the Professional Darts Players Association, confirming he had stepped down as a director.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I'll give you the scoop. I put my resignation into the PDPA on Monday. No big thing. I left on good terms. It was my decision.
"I have a wonderful relationship with every director and with Nicola as well. They're a fabulous team. But I won't be doing PDPA anymore going forward.
He cited both workload and communication issues within the professional game. Durrant was refreshingly honest about his reasons.
"Not enough. I designed a booklet that I was really proud of. It took me 20, 40, 60 hours. We put it on all 128 tables at the first ProTour. At the end of the day I collected 78 of them back in. I've tried to speak to as many players as possible but, for every player I've helped, there are others asking me, "Are you still on the PDPA, Glen?"
"Well, they should know that. That's down to me. Alan is a great leader. Andy Scott lives and breathes the game. Jamie Caven will take on the mantle in years to come, Jacques (Nieuwlaat) great respect."
Nothing to do with Manley says Durrant on departure.
"Something had to give. People will think I've packed in because of this or that. It has nothing to do with the directors. I simply couldn't keep up with the workload. My diary is disgusting. Whenever there was a PDPA meeting I found myself looking at the clock and that's not right. I know what doing a good job looks like because I worked in a profession for over 30 years. I'm disappointed I couldn't give the role what it deserved, but I'll never say slag off the PDPA."
Durrant didn't mention Peter Manley and he said that while they did clash that he gave up the role simply as he thought he wasn't good enough and not due to any party. "We're similar. We wind each other up. We give and we take.
"He's not the easiest person to work with, but I have a lot of respect for Peter Manley, more respect than people would think.
"People will think it's an easy answer that I'm not getting on with a member of the PDPA. That's not the case. They work a lot harder than I did as a PDPA director. But there was times, certainly I had a lot of frustrations.
"There were negatives, but the positives outweigh the negatives. The reason I'm leaving is because I wasn't good enough, not because I didn't get on with Peter Manley. We're very, very similar. I'm leaving because I wasn't good enough."
But he is not fully closing the door on potential future work with the PDPA and said that he would go back if given the chance.
"I would. I would go back. You never say no. And as the director said, what if everything ended tomorrow? What if Sky said, Glen, you've been a great commentator, but we don't want you no more. ITV said to me, thanks for the two competitions you did in 2026, but we won't be looking at you in 2027.
"You know, I've got an office now. You know, the coaching's going great. What happens if the bubble bursts in 2027? Nobody wants to come to it.
"I wasn't satisfied myself with what I was doing. When I was hearing, are you still on the PDPA? That hurt, you know, because they should know I am. I should be out there saying, look, if you've got a problem, come and talk to me. Would I go back? Yeah, Possibly, but things would have to change."

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






