"Imagine if I didn’t win those three Euro Tours — I’d probably be at Q School… or a commentator like Glen": Nathan Aspinall honest on ranking drop
PDCNathan Aspinall kept his hopes of reaching the knockout stages of the 2025 Grand Slam of Darts alive with a battling 5–2 victory over Alex Spellman, bouncing back strongly after a frustrating opening-night defeat to Michael Smith.
ADVERTISEMENT
The 2023 World Matchplay champion admitted that his finishing had been “out of character” in the loss to Smith, but despite more missed doubles against Spellman, he did enough to claim two crucial points and move into contention for qualification from Group C.
“Obviously, the Michael game — I should have won 5–0,” Aspinall reflected. “I lost 5–3. My fault, not his fault. I missed so many doubles. Doubling isn’t my strong point anyway, but that was so out of character last night.
All the latest Grand Slam of Darts news is in our tournament centre.
All the latest Grand Slam of Darts news is in our tournament centre.
“I’ve played so well the last four weeks. You’ve got to accept that this is going to happen sometimes, and unfortunately for me it happened in the first game of the Grand Slam.”
Read also
Despite knowing the defeat left him with no margin for error, Aspinall said he still felt confident of progressing if he could beat world number one Luke Humphries in his final group match.
“Michael won, I didn’t — so it’s put my back against the wall. But I know what I’ve got to do: win the next two games and keep my chances alive,” he said. “I scored well again tonight, but the finishing was in the back of my mind. Still, I got the win, the two points, and the plus-three leg difference. Let’s see what happens — I know what I’ve got to do tomorrow.”
Aspinall relishing a shootout
ADVERTISEMENT
The Stockport thrower revealed that he and fellow player Chris Dobey have been sharing accommodation this week, and joked that he was already hoping for a winner-takes-all clash against Humphries.
“I said to Dobey, ‘Listen, I want Smithy to beat Luke. Simple as that.’ I want to play Luke in a shootout — that’s what we’re used to: winner goes through, loser goes home. That’s when the fire in the belly comes out.”
Aspinall admitted that the group-stage format can be a mental challenge, especially after suffering an early defeat.
“I love the Grand Slam and I love the group stage, but it’s weird coming back into a venue 12 hours after you’ve been beaten,” he said. “Still, it’s a fantastic tournament — I’ve lost my first game before and still got through, and I plan to do the same again this year.”
Perspective after a difficult start
ADVERTISEMENT
The world number 20 said he had arrived in Wolverhampton confident of topping the group but once again finds himself taking the hard route.
“When I came down on Friday, in my head I was beating Michael Smith, having a good game with Luke Humphries, and beating Spellman to qualify,” he said. “Obviously that’s not happened. But you know me — I do it the hard way, and I thrive off that.
“It’s a bit boring just winning all your games 5–0! I can go home tonight, get a kebab with Dobey, and look forward to a big night tomorrow.”
Read also
On Michael Smith’s struggles
ADVERTISEMENT
Asked about Michael Smith’s injury problems and their off-stage friendship, Aspinall was characteristically honest.
“No, I wanted to absolutely iron him out! I don’t care about his injuries — off the oche, I do. I love the guy to bits,” he smiled. “I’ve tried to help him over the last six months. He’s going through what I went through, so I’ve got sympathy for him.
“But obviously last night I wanted to smash him — simple as that. It didn’t pan out that way. I was happy for him that he won, well… not when he beat me! But he needs confidence, and he’ll come back fine.”
Aspinall added that despite joking about helping Smith, he had stayed in contact while his fellow Englishman battled through a tough period.
“The guy doesn’t answer his phone, so I’ve actually not helped him!” he laughed. “But I’ve been messaging him, and he told me there were only three people who’ve been checking in on him — and I was one of them.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I know how it feels to drop down the rankings through no fault of your own. He’ll come back — he’s too good not to.”
Rankings reality check
Despite winning three European Tour titles this year, Aspinall has slipped to 20th in the world rankings — but he insisted that the system is fair. “I agree with the rankings,” he said. “I won a tournament, I won a chunk of money, and I’ve had two years knowing it was coming off. I haven’t defended it, so why should I stay up there?
“Imagine if I didn’t win those three Euro Tours — I’d probably be at Q School… or a commentator like Glen (Durrant)!”
ADVERTISEMENT
“It’s down to me now to fight and get back into a position where I’m selected for stuff. That means performing on TV. Maybe I’m thinking about that too much, which is why my stage game isn’t matching my floor game. But listen, I know how good I am, and I know where I’ll be at the end of the year.”
Spellman battle and the road ahead
Reflecting on the 5–2 victory over American debutant Alex Spellman, Aspinall admitted the match wasn’t as straightforward as the scoreline might suggest. “He played better than last night,” Aspinall said. “We watched him and I spoke to him before he went on — he admitted how rubbish he was last night, and I said, ‘You won’t do that again,’ and he didn’t. "They’re the games everyone expects me to win, and I expect to win. He played with a bit of freedom early on and made it tough, but when I pulled away, I think he probably gave in a bit. He’s a great guy, though — I’ve met him before when he went over to America. But yeah, that was a game I should have won, and I did.”
Aspinall now faces Humphries in a must-win final group match and is expecting another high-quality contest. “What I always expect from Luke — 105 average, a fantastic game, played in great spirit,” he said. “Whoever hits more doubles wins.”
Putting the past behind
ADVERTISEMENT
Aspinall also revealed the frustration that lingered after his opening defeat, joking that he literally walked it off.
“Yeah, it was important to forget about last night and I didn’t!” he laughed. “I was so disappointed I left the venue and actually walked halfway home. That’s why I’m wearing these today my trainers are filthy! Walking through tunnels and God knows where.
“I had to try and forget about it, but it ruined me last night. It was a tough defeat to take. But I’ve won that game now — start of a new week tomorrow morning, and we go again.”

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







