
In Northampton, during a relaxed exhibition evening, Joe Cullen was unusually candid about his current form, his frustrations, and how his relationship with the sport that made him has shifted.
ADVERTISEMENT
Fresh off a run of Players Championships and – as is so often the case late in the year – buried in a hectic spell of tournaments, travel days, and commercial commitments, ‘The Rockstar’ still took his time to both reflect and look ahead.
Exhibitions as a breather
Cullen visibly enjoys nights like these. Exhibitions are a welcome change of pace for many top players, and he’s no different. “You don’t feel the pressure like you do on the Pro Tour,” he says in conversation with Online Darts. “You can have a laugh, you can relax, and you see how much the fans enjoy it. That’s what makes it fun. And honestly, sometimes I need these nights to keep a bit of rhythm.”
Despite the enjoyable setting, the underlying theme remains serious: his form has been inconsistent, and it annoys him. “One day I feel great, the next day I throw terribly,” Cullen admitted. “Sometimes I don’t know how I’m going to play when I walk on stage.”
He referenced one match in particular: “Against Ricky Evans on the European Tour I felt fantastic beforehand. Better than I had in a long time. Then I probably threw the worst darts of my season. That sums my year up perfectly.”
Even so, Cullen still managed to win two titles this year — a remarkable stat given his own dissatisfaction with his play. “There are guys who’ve been really consistent but haven’t picked up a title. I’d rather be consistent, but I’ve got two titles. So it’s still in there somewhere.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
The Grand Slam of Darts – and a flawed qualification system
Cullen missed the Grand Slam of Darts again, a tournament he describes as a “love-hate relationship”. He wasn’t shocked, but he didn’t shy away from criticism either. “The PDC knows the criteria don’t work. They couldn’t change it this year, but next year they will — they have to.”
With the expansion to 48 players and 16 groups, Cullen expects the world’s top 16 to become automatic group seeds. “That would make sense. But how they fill the rest? No idea. We’ll have to see what the PDC comes up with, but they usually get it right.”
One recurring discussion in the sport is whether top-16 players receive too much protection. Cullen has seen both sides: years inside the elite, and now outside it. “It’s fifty-fifty,” he said. “Yeah, the top 16 deserve protection. But it’s also true they’re more protected now than they used to be. When I was in the top 16, it wasn’t as much.”
But he knows no rule will please everybody. “The players who just miss out on qualification are always the loudest.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Joe Cullen in action
The reality: everyone’s focused on themselves
On the floor, nobody is really talking about big names missing tournaments. Not about Michael van Gerwen skipping Minehead, nor about Luke Humphries or Nathan Aspinall having wobbles.
“Nobody really cares,” Cullen said plainly. “We’re all selfish in this sport. I want my mates to do well, but ultimately I think about myself — and so do they.”
Players often get criticised for skipping Pro Tours, but Cullen called that out. “Fans think top players hardly play, but they play plenty. Sometimes more than people realise.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
The Hildesheim controversy
Earlier this year Cullen and Johnny Clayton faced criticism for their less than positive comments on Hildesheim — one of the regular Pro Tour venues. But Cullen insists they’re far from alone.
“I reckon 19 out of 20 top British players think the same, they just don’t say it out loud. It’s not a big deal: if you don’t want to go, you don’t go. That’s how the PDC has worked for years.”
The irony isn’t lost on him. “I slagged Hildesheim off, then went and won a title there to qualify for the World Grand Prix. People have reminded me often enough.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Cullen is a one-time PDC major winner
Falling out of love with the game
The most striking moment of the evening came when Cullen spoke about his passion for darts — or the lack of it. “I don’t enjoy it like I used to,” he admitted. “I used to look forward to tournaments. Now I mainly look forward to being with the lads. That’s not good if you want to reach the top.”
The reasons, he says, are both professional and personal. “There are guys with less talent than me but who’ve got a hundred times more hunger. You feel that in matches. That’s when I struggle.”
He pointed to Wessel Nijman as an example of a player who “loves the game and shows it”. The rise of Luke Littler, he added, has boosted enthusiasm among younger players even further. “You can earn millions now if you’re good enough. That attracts a whole new generation.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Is the fire gone for good?
When asked whether the hunger could return, Cullen hesitated.
“It’s not gone, it’s more… dormant. In the World Championship match against Wessel I suddenly felt it again. But you can’t force that every match, especially not on some random floor event in Leicester.”
“I’ve got to find that middle ground. I used to be good on the floor and bad on TV, then it swapped. Now I need to get both back.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Worlds on the horizon – and growing urgency
With the Players Championship Finals up next, Cullen’s focus is gradually shifting towards Alexandra Palace. He has a lot of prize money to defend and knows what’s at stake. “Thirty-five grand is a lot. I need to be sharp. Maybe a tough draw will help — it might switch me on.”
Exhibitions like Northampton help keep him in rhythm. “If I have two weeks off, I don’t practise enough. I know that about myself.”
The 2026 calendar includes new European Tour stops like Krakow, and Cullen is looking forward to it. “Everyone I speak to raves about Poland. I’m taking my wife. We also want to visit Auschwitz — it’s been on my list for a long time.”
ADVERTISEMENT
But he knows next season can’t start slowly. “I’m defending a lot. I can’t afford a bad start.”
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







