"I've probably got to pull my finger out, put a bit more practice in": Rob Cross admits motivation is a current problem
PDC
Despite the peaceful surroundings of Warwickshire’s lakes at the Target Sports Fishing Championship for the Willow Foundation, Rob Cross was in a reflective mood—not just about his day’s angling misfortunes, but about the state of his darts career.
ADVERTISEMENT
Cross, who’s been a familiar face at the charity event for years, was candid from the outset: “Do you know, I've done it for many years now. I think it's probably my sixth or seventh attempt. Yeah, never really done any good—I think I've finished third. But look, it's a special place. It's a great day out, you come and see some great people, and it's just nice to be part of it, I suppose.”
The former World Champion might have been laughing about dropping his water bottle into the lake. "I was just multitasking, weren’t I? I’m a bit all fingers and thumbs, and I managed to drop my bottle of water in. I think, where I weren’t catching at the time, I was trying to knock the fish on their heads, you know?” —
but when it came to his darts, there was little disguising his frustration.
“I don’t know. I sort of feel... the motivation’s a problem for me at the minute, you know?” he admitted. “I’ve had a bit of time out. I think I’ve played four or five times in seven weeks, and I felt good for the Matchplay, actually. Managed to do a bit of practice and stuff. Concentration’s probably a little bit of an issue, though. I was 6–2 up, averaging 108, 109, and then it was like switching the tap off. So yeah, I need to correct that really, going into the rest of the year from September onwards. But yeah, motivation’s got to change. I’ve probably got to pull my finger out, put a bit more practice in, get a bit more keen—more passionate about the game.”
Read also
The early exit from Blackpool still stings. Cross believes he let the match slip away from a strong position against Dirk van Duijvenbode, despite usually thriving in longer formats. “Do you know, I really enjoy a longer format. If anything, I thought, where I started, if I was going to blow it, I’d blow it at the start—and I was strong at the start. Managed to go in 3–2, then I was 6–2 up in the next session, and I think I walked off at 6–4 or whatever.
“But I expected to get stronger like I normally do, and it just wasn’t meant to be. I sort of lost concentration, got a bit weaker. I had one moment where I missed three at 32, busted the score, and it put a nail in the coffin for me—being brutally honest. But look, that’s darts. If I don’t work hard enough... I’m not the most natural player out of all of us up there. Some people probably wouldn’t have to pick a dart up for a month and still come back and be very decent. So yeah, I need to put that work in.”

Rob Cross admits motivation is a current issue
ADVERTISEMENT
With key events on the horizon—including two majors in October and November, followed by the World Championship—Cross knows something has to change. And he’s already begun. “For me, I’m back on a fitness regime. I’m out walking every day, doing a bit of exercise, getting a bit of air in the lungs. I think that’s really important for me. I’ve lost a bit of weight recently, so I feel a little bit better.
“That’s what it comes down to for me—I’ve got to feel well in myself. If I don’t feel well in myself, it reflects in my darts. So, I’ll work harder on myself, start practising, carry on with the fitness, and just keep getting my steps in.”
Full of praise for Josh Rock
While his own form may be stuttering, Cross is full of praise for his fellow professionals. Among them, 23-year-old Josh Rock, whose performances at the Matchplay and World Cup caught widespread attention.
“I don’t think [getting over the line] is an issue. He’s a class act. He’s been playing well, probably like the best player in the world at times. This year, over the last five months, he’s been purely incredible. It’s great to be around and great to see, and he’s a great lad. What I’d say is, I don’t think he needs to worry about the winning side of it. The more you worry about winning, the more you create a problem. I think he just needs to carry on doing what he’s doing, playing as well as he is, and enjoying it. The wins will come for him.
ADVERTISEMENT
“He’s really showing his worth at the minute—and rightfully so. For the future, don’t stress about it. If it doesn’t happen, come back bigger and stronger next time. I thought he had a great Matchplay last week. I watched his games. My boy always supports him, sometimes a little too much! He’s doing all the right things, making all the right noises in the right places, and his game’s really come together. Whatever he’s been doing at home, just keep doing that. Don’t change it. The wins will come. He’s been incredible this year.”
Wade underappreciated
Another standout performer in Blackpool was James Wade—a player Cross feels has long gone underappreciated. “I would, 100%. James when he wants to do something he just goes and does it. Look at his Matchplay last week. He was absolutely blinding, amazing. His averages, his double hitting, he’s always been a great double hitter. But I think his scoring last week... he’s probably been playing well for a fair bit of time now. I think he’s overlooked sometimes on the Pro Tours. If you’re not in the Premier League or the big events like the World Series of Darts, people don’t see you as much. So, for him to come in last week and show everyone how well he’s been playing—credit to him."
“He’s a lovely guy and, look, an incredible dart player when he’s on and so tough to beat.”
“He’s a lovely guy and, look, an incredible dart player when he’s on and so tough to beat.”
Read also

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026








