German Darts Grand Prix Sunday Evening Round-up | Michael van Gerwen and Gian van Veen big-name casualties as Aspinall, Rock, Clayton squeeze through tight contests
PDC
The 2026 German Darts Grand Prix has brought a huge amount
of upsets in the second day of action. After six seeds departed in the
afternoon session, another four would exit the tournament at this early stage.
The most notable was reigning champion Michael van Gerwen who fell 6-1 to an
inspired Niko Springer.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Gerwen had darts to break but missed a pair of them on
tops. Springer hit that target before repeating the events to break the four-time
champion. He would then take out 52 before pinning double 19 with no hesitation
to move into a flabbergasting 4-0 lead.
‘Mighty Mike’ has lost just two matches in this tournament,
both coming against Luke Humphries in 7-0 and 8-1 defeats. He prevented the
whitewash but another missed dart at double 16 allowed Springer to return to the
oche and came in clutch on double five to move within one of the match.
‘Meenzer Bub’ got the job done on tops, cementing a
statement display against one of the world’s best to set up a third round
showdown against the 2023 champion Michael Smith.

Niko Springer has thrashed Michael van Gerwen to enter the third round in the German Darts Grand Prix
| Michael Van Gerwen | VS | Niko Springer |
|---|---|---|
| 94.56 | Average (3 Darts) | 98.34 |
| 4 | 100+ Thrown | 9 |
| 6 | 140+ Thrown | 1 |
| 3 | 180 Thrown | 4 |
| 32 | Highest Checkout | 52 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 14.29 | Checkout percentage | 46.15 |
| 1 / 7 | Checkout | 5 / 15 |
Van Veen among big names to fall as other Premier League talents edge through
The number one seed and 2025 runner-up Gian van Veen was the
last man in action, but he was hapless against a brilliant William O'Connor who dumped him out in a convincing 6-2 triumph. 'The Giant' kicked off with a hold but was pegged back in ominous fashion. He won three legs on the spin, missing double 14 for a 121 before coming back to mop up to move 3-1 in front. A comical moment occurred when O'Connor sipped van Veen's water from the wrong table.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
He soon recovered from that little slip-up by finding a maximum before taking out 120 for a double-break advantage and a commanding 4-1 lead. Van Veen got one of the breaks back before O'Connor missed five darts ahead of coming in clutch on double seven to sneak within one of a massive victory. He finished in style, taking out 108 on double 14 to cause yet another huge upset in this tournament.
Josh Rock and Ryan Joyce both mustered up a brilliant match
of darts, but it was the Northern Irishman able to win it 6-4. Rock began with
an 11-darter along with some incredible scoring to break. He backed it up with
a hold before Joyce got a first leg on the board with a little helping hand
from double 16 before getting back level thanks to wasted doubling by ‘Rocky.’
Rock’s blistering start felt like a distant memory as Joyce took
the lead with a 10-darter. Another burst by Rock put him ahead with a break
advantage but that was extinguished within an instant by Joyce who took out 72
for the second time in the match, this time via double 16. A third consecutive
break by Rock was done with a fantastic 140 checkout which put him within a whisker
from victory. The World Cup champion booked his spot in the third round with
both players averaging over 102 in a high quality affair.
Marcel Hausotter almost caused one of the biggest upset
results in Euro Tour history but was just pipped at the post by Jonny Clayton
6-5 in a dramatic last-leg decider. The match did not start well for Clayton. He
went for the bull thinking he was on 66 when in fact he was on 46. Fortunately,
he was able to get to a double but missed chances allowed Hausotter to nick the
first leg. More holds of throw followed in routine fashion as the German kept
Clayton at bay, finding a 12-darter to go 3-2 in front.
ADVERTISEMENT
Hausotter got a standing ovation from everyone inside the Kulturhalle
Zenith after going seven darts into the perfect leg. He finished in
11-darts as Clayton failed to make any impact on his throw. ‘Hausi’ would pin
the bull for an 81 checkout to move one from victory and another incredible
upset after knocking out Raymond van Barneveld. The contest would go to a
last-leg decider, and Hausotter was looking like he was set to have a dart for
the match but completely missed the 16 segment when on 123. This allowed
Clayton, who had missed the bull in the prior visit, to come back and clean up 25
to survive a huge scare.
| Josh Rock | VS | Ryan Joyce |
|---|---|---|
| 102.57 | Average (3 Darts) | 103.24 |
| 13 | 100+ Thrown | 16 |
| 6 | 140+ Thrown | 7 |
| 5 | 180 Thrown | 2 |
| 140 | Highest Checkout | 72 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 42.86 | Checkout percentage | 66.67 |
| 6 / 14 | Checkout | 4 / 7 |
Aspinall and Wade on contrasting ends of last-leg deciders
James Wade played his 100th Euro Tour event, once
more showcasing his incredible longevity. However, he has now gone five
consecutive Euro Tour events without a win with Kevin Doets coming back from 4-2
and 5-3 to take down Wade 6-5.
Holds of throw dominated the early proceedings. Doets missed
double 12 for a 101 checkout before the next leg Wade showed him how it was done
with a 104 checkout on tops. He then broke with an 84 checkout before edging
further clear aided by double seven after going inside on double 14 for a
second ton+ checkout of the match.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Doets ends the mini leg drought before having four chances
to break. However, twice on the spin he went inside on double 18 and nine. Wade’s
response was going double 18-double 20 for a 96 outshot to move one from the
match. ‘Hawkeye’ used his precision to pin the bull for a 170 after leaving it
for the fourth time in the match. He then broke back to leave it at 5-5 and
would successfully hold to seal a fine comeback win.

Kevin Doets continues is eye-catching form with a win over James Wade in Munich
Despite trouble with dartitis, Ricardo Pietreczko fought
bravely to push Natham Aspinall the distance, losing 6-5 in a thrilling tie of
darts. Pietreczko reached this stage after narrowly defeating Ian White despite
averaging 79. It was a tumultuous match but he managed to kickstart his second
round match with a hold. Aspinall responded before some dartitis crept in for ‘Pikachu.’
He fell a break behind as the Englishman sailed into a 3-1 lead.
Pietreczko was not letting his woes effect him as he kept on
tabs with his rival, holding to move 3-2 behind before a ‘come on’ echoed up by
the former Matchplay champion indicated that he restored his two-leg cushion. However,
‘Pikachu’ fought back. He won two legs on the spin to level at 4-4 and had
regained the throw. Aspinall went six into the perfect leg and left 58 after
nine, but two squandered efforts at tops was overshadowed by Pietreczko taking
out 201 in four darts to take the lead for the first time since the start of
the contest. A 12-darter from Aspinall set up a hugely intriguing last-leg
decider. Pietreczko had the first match winning dart but missed the bull. Aspinall
was able to get the job completed shortly after to fend off a defiant opponent.
ADVERTISEMENT
It was not pretty, but Martin Schindler managed to conclude
an action-packed evening for German darters with a 6-4 win against Brendan
Dolan. On 54, Schindler fails to get to a double for a break. This sloppiness was
made to pay by Dolan who held his throw. The German number one would find his
groove with a three-leg spurt which saw him break the Dolan throw and move
ahead.
Read also
The Irishman managed to close the gap while ending the leg drought
and almost pounced on a golden situation when Schindler missed eight darts for
the leg. However, ‘The History Maker’ spurned five of his own and Schindler got
away with one to go 4-2 to the good. Three more routine holds saw Schindler
move 5-4 in front but Dolan was pressuring ‘The Wall.’ He had a dart to break
the throw but missed, allowing Schindler three more opportunities to win the
match. He took his fourth match dart and pictured a relieved figure at the end.
Kim Huybrechts thrashed Luke Woodhouse 6-1 in another
example that he is getting back to his best. The inform Belgian started the
faster, taking out 126 on double six to break and go 2-0 in front. He made it
three out of three on the outer ring to move halfway from victory. He was
averaging 118.6 at this point. Woodhouse, who was also averaging over a ton,
managed to get a first leg on the board despite the barrage coming his way. He
was then offered a poke at the 152 to break back but failed to pin the double.
ADVERTISEMENT
Huybrechts reinstated his three-leg lead before snatching
another break of throw before being afforded multiple match darts thanks to some
sloppiness by ‘Woody.’ While his average dipped to just above a ton, it was a
fantastic performance from ‘The Hurricane.’
| Luke Woodhouse | VS | Kim Huybrechts |
|---|---|---|
| 94.48 | Average (3 Darts) | 100.26 |
| 10 | 100+ Thrown | 9 |
| 3 | 140+ Thrown | 8 |
| 1 | 180 Thrown | 1 |
| 68 | Highest Checkout | 126 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 1 |
| 16.67 | Checkout percentage | 54.55 |
| 1 / 6 | Checkout | 6 / 11 |
Read also

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026










