Preview Monday afternoon PDC World Darts Championship 2026: Wright faces Van Leuven in headline act
PDC
On Monday afternoon, December 15, the next four first-round matches at the 2026 PDC World Darts Championship are on the schedule. They feature, among others, a two-time world champion, a lightning-fast Scot, and a rising prospect.
ADVERTISEMENT
The afternoon opens with “The History Maker” Brendan Dolan against 21-year-old Tavis Dudeney. Next up is Scotsman Cameron Menzies, renowned for his blistering pace, who faces 20-year-old talent Charlie Manby. Then it’s Mensur Suljovic versus David Cameron, before we finish with the blockbuster between two-time world champion Peter Wright and the Dutchwoman Noa-Lynn van Leuven.
2026 World Darts Championship schedule
Monday, December 15
Afternoon session (from 12:30 PM)
| 12:40 PM | Brendan Dolan | v | Tavis Dudeney | R1 |
| 1:40 PM | Cameron Menzies | v | Charlie Manby | R1 |
| 2:40 PM | Mensur Sujovic | v | David Cameron | R1 |
| 3:40 PM | Peter Wright | v | Noa-Lynn van Leuven | R1 |
Brendan Dolan v Tavis Dudeney
Brendan Dolan heads to his 18th World Championship. The Northern Irishman has been around for years and reached the quarterfinals twice in previous appearances, most recently two years ago. On the floor this year he posted decent results, reaching the semifinals twice and even one final. He played only twice on the European Tour, and both times his run ended after one match.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
He meets 21-year-old Tavis Dudeney, who makes his Alexandra Palace debut. The young Englishman mainly played the Development Tour and floor events this year. The floor, however, was a struggle. He reached the last 16 once but otherwise suffered mostly first-round exits. On the Development Tour he made two quarterfinals and one semifinal. That left him 29th on that ranking, which wasn’t enough for a Worlds ticket. He therefore took one last shot at the World Championship Tour Card Holder Qualifier, and that paid off. He defeated Darryl Pilgrim, Jim Long, and Martijn Dragt in succession to claim one of the final five spots. On paper, Dolan’s experience makes him a slight favorite.

Dolan prepares for his eighteenth appearance at the World Championship.
Cameron Menzies v Charlie Manby
Next comes one of the most enticing matches of the first round. Cameron Menzies takes on prospect Charlie Manby. Menzies has had an excellent year and has climbed to 26th on the Order of Merit. At the Players Championship events the Scot was formidable, reaching three semifinals and winning the title at the fourth event. Beyond the floor, ‘Cammy’ also performed well. On the European Tour he was consistent and made several final days. The quarterfinals proved his ceiling there. Only on the majors did it disappoint somewhat. He reached the quarterfinals at the World Grand Prix, but elsewhere the Scot often exited early.
Menzies won’t have been thrilled with the draw. He immediately runs into one of the most exciting prospects in Charlie Manby. The 20-year-old played both the Challenge Tour and the Development Tour this year. He particularly excelled on the latter and finished fourth on the Order of Merit, securing his spot at this Worlds. He also won two tournaments at the MODUS Super Series. ‘Champagne’ will be among the contenders to earn a Tour Card at Q-School in January. While Menzies will still be the favorite on paper, Manby can certainly trouble the Scot and possibly even win. If he handles the Ally Pally pressure, this could turn into a thriller.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Mensur Suljovic v David Cameron
Mensur Suljovic and David Cameron then go head-to-head. Suljovic travels to Alexandra Palace for the seventeenth time, where he has never truly shone. In sixteen previous appearances he reached the third round only four times. The Austrian is also not in the best phase of his career. He failed to convince on the floor and played just five European Tour events, with one last-16 run. He has slipped to 56th in the world rankings, putting him in danger of dropping out of the top 64 and losing his Tour Card.
He faces Canadian David Cameron in the first round. Cameron played the CDC Pro Tour this year, reaching three semifinals and one final. That route also earned his World Championship qualification. The pair look evenly matched, so the small margins may decide it. Suljovic has more experience on the big stage, which could work in his favor.
Peter Wright v Noa-Lynn van Leuven
ADVERTISEMENT
And then the closer: ‘Snakebite’ Peter Wright opens against Dutchwoman Noa-Lynn van Leuven. Wright is a two-time world champion and knows what it takes to perform on the Alexandra Palace stage. He heads to London for the seventeenth time but with less confidence than in previous years. The Scot has long been battling for form. Yet he often finds something special at Ally Pally, as shown last year when he shocked everyone by knocking out Luke Humphries in the last 16. Judging purely by his results this year, however, nothing suggests a deep run. And Van Leuven might even spring an upset straight away.
It’s common knowledge that all big names are wary of their opening match at the Worlds, simply because that first hurdle must be cleared. So Wright will first want to survive round one, and Van Leuven is no easy opponent. The Dutchwoman won two Women’s Series titles, no mean feat with Beau Greaves dominating most events there. She also gained Worlds experience last year, losing in the first round to compatriot Kevin Doets. If she finds her best game, she has a genuine chance to beat Wright, but much depends on how ‘Snakebite’ turns up. If he’s found something and rediscovers his old form it will be tough, but if he continues to toil as he has all year, there are real opportunities for Van Leuven to claim her first Ally Pally win.

Can Van Leuven claim her first win on the World Championship stage at Alexandra Palace?
Read also

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026










