Preview Monday night Grand Slam of Darts: Humphries-Aspinall, Price, Wade and Michael Smith headline
PDC
The 2025 Grand Slam of Darts takes place in Wolverhampton this week. The first four days of the tournament traditionally see the completion of the group stage. Last weekend the first two group matches were finished, Monday night the decision in pools A, B, C and D will be made.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Grand Slam of Darts is not similar to the other majors, for example, a group stage takes place first. In total, there are eight groups of four players, where after three matches played, the top two players from the group advance to the knockout stage. Luke Littler starts the tournament as the defending champion, after winning 16-3 over Martin Lukeman in last year's final. We will see who will qualify for the 'group of death' with Luke Humphries, Michael Smith and Nathan Aspinall.
Schedule Grand Slam of Darts 2025
| Date + time | Player 1 | Player 2 | |
| 9/11 19:15 | James Wade | v | Ricky Evans |
| 9/11 19:45 | Chris Dobey | v | Martin Lukeman |
| 9/11 20:15 | Stephen Bunting | v | Luke Woodhouse |
| 9/11 20:45 | Martin Schindler | v | Alexis Toylo |
| 9/11 21:15 | Damon Heta | v | Jurjen van der Velde |
| 9/11 21:45 | Gerwyn Price | v | Stefan Bellmont |
| 9/11 22:15 | Michael Smith | v | Alex Spellman |
| 9/11 22:45 | Luke Humphries | v | Nathan Aspinall |
James Wade vs. Ricky Evans (Group D)
The evening in Wolverhampton will be kicked off with the duel between James Wade and Ricky Evans. For Wade, nothing more is at stake. After defeats against Stefan Bellmont and Gerwyn Price, qualification chances are gone for the 42-year-old Englishman.
Evans, on the other hand, is already sure of a place in the eighth finals after two consecutive wins. 'Rapid' can therefore play freely and, given his current form, that could provide fireworks. Wade and Evans last met in the summer of last year, when Wade prevailed 6-5 at the 15th Players Championship.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Chris Dobey vs. Martin Lukeman (Group B)
The stakes are also low in this match. Chris Dobey is already sure of a place in the eighth finals with two wins from two matches. Martin Lukeman, on the other hand - after all, last year's finalist - is already eliminated after zero out of two.
Dobey and Lukeman played each other three times before. Their last meeting was earlier this year at Players Championship 5, when Lukeman managed to win 6-4.
Stephen Bunting vs Luke Woodhouse (Group C)
ADVERTISEMENT
Stephen Bunting has already won tournaments at the World Series of Darts, the Players Championship and the European Tour this year. Only on the majors it did not really flourish for 'The Bullet'. He had his sights set on a strong performance at the Grand Slam of Darts, but after two consecutive defeats Bunting cannot qualify for the next round.
So his final group match against Luke Woodhouse is only for honor. How different it is for Woodhouse, who after two consecutive wins is already sure of qualifying for the knockout phase. 'Woody' is having a very stable year anyway and actually confirms all the good things we have seen from him in recent months. Bunting and Woodhouse already played each other twice this year, each time the victory went to Bunting.
Martin Schindler vs. Alexis Toylo (Group C)
Next up is Martin Schindler and Alexis Toylo, who will decide in a straight duel who will advance to the next round along with Luke Woodhouse. Schindler lost his opening duel to Woodhouse, but then won to Bunting, keeping his chances cool.
Toylo, on the other hand, opened with a win against Bunting and then lost to Woodhouse. The Filipino takes a particularly long time between his throws, so it remains to be seen how Schindler will deal with that. In principle, the German has enough experience and is also the better player, but it will probably not be easy. By the way, it is only the first time that both men play each other.
ADVERTISEMENT
Damon Heta vs. Jurjen van der Velde (Group B)
Damon Heta and Jurjen van der Velde battle it out in a straight duel to see who advances to the next round along with Chris Dobey. Heta won his first match, but lost his second match without a chance. For Van der Velde, the situation was reversed, he lost his first match without a chance and then triumphed against Martin Lukeman.
Incidentally, Heta and Van der Velde have never played against each other before. The 38-year-old Australian may have the most experience, but he often has more trouble performing strongly in the majors than in floor tournaments. It remains to be seen whether Van der Velde can cause a surprise here by advancing to the knockout phase as a non-Tour Card holder.
Gerwyn Price vs Stefan Bellmont (Group D)
Next it was the turn of Gerwyn Price and Stefan Bellmont, who battled it out in a straight duel to see who would advance to the knockout stage along with Ricky Evans. Price recovered handsomely against Wade after surprisingly losing his opening match to Evans. The 40-year-old Welshman is having a good year anyway, including several titles at the Players Championship. Only that major title is still missing for "The Iceman," who has already won this tournament three times.
ADVERTISEMENT
Bellmont makes his debut at the Grand Slam of Darts this year and after a win in his opening match against Wade, he went down particularly narrowly 5-4 against Evans. So it remains to be seen how the relatively inexperienced Swiss will handle the stress of a deciding match. Price and Bellmont played each other once before, at the fourth Players Championship this year Bellmont won 6-4
Player Details: Gerwyn Price
| Total Earnings: | £4,672,750 |
| Order of Merit: | 9 |
| 9 Darters: | 8 |
| Tour Card Years: | 11 |
| Highest Average: | 117.88 |
| Highest TV Average: | 117.88 |
Michael Smith vs. Alex Spellman (Group A)
In the penultimate match, Michael Smith takes on Alex Spellman. Both players still have a chance to qualify for the next round, although a lot has to happen for Spellman for that to become a reality. In any case, the American needs a big win to have any chance at all.
ADVERTISEMENT
Smith, on the other hand, will need a win anyway, if Humphries wins from Aspinall. Otherwise it is a matter of calculation and Smith could also benefit from a big win. Both men have never played each other before, but given his status Smith starts this match as clear favorite.
Read also
Player Details: Michael Smith
| Total Earnings: | £4,239,798 |
| Order of Merit: | 24 |
| 9 Darters: | 9 |
| Tour Card Years: | 14 |
| Highest Average: | 132.61 |
| Highest TV Average: | 113.62 |
Luke Humphries vs. Nathan Aspinall (Group A)
This match promises fireworks: Luke Humphries against Nathan Aspinall is a match you could also encounter in a final. Humphries, the current number one in the world, exudes calmness and confidence. At this Grand Slam of Darts, he won his first two matches, yet he is not quite sure of qualifying for the next round. With a win against Aspinall, he is a group winner anyway.
ADVERTISEMENT
For Aspinall, on the other hand, the situation is a lot more complicated. A win against Humphries would significantly improve his chances, but even then it's watching what Michael Smith does against Alex Spellman. Their last two matches between them were won each time by Humphries, will Aspinall manage to break that negative trend?
Player Details: Luke Humphries
| Total Earnings: | £3,326,663 |
| Order of Merit: | 1 |
| 9 Darters: | 6 |
| Tour Card Years: | 7 |
| Highest Average: | 119.15 |
| Highest TV Average: | 118.43 |

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







