Ross Smith leads the way, who are the PDC's premier 180 hitters? Does power scoring indicate success?
PDC
There has long been an assumption within the darting world that more 180s naturally lead to more victories. While that can often be the case, it’s important to recognise that scoring power isn’t the only factor in becoming a consistent high-level performer.
ADVERTISEMENT
Take Jonny Clayton, for example — he’s known for being a clinical finisher, often stepping up at the key moments to close out legs. Striking the right balance in your game is a challenge many players face. While strong scoring lays the foundation, it’s the ability to capitalise on those positions and turn them into wins that truly separates the best from the rest.
Read also
On 21st June, Darts Orakel released a list of the top five 180 hitters in Players Championship and European Tour events over the past two years — with several notable names included. While this list doesn’t paint the full picture of a player’s success, it does highlight those with the potential to become future superstars, provided they can find greater consistency in closing out legs.
5 - Josh Rock
Northern Ireland’s Josh Rock comes in at fifth place on this list — and it’s no surprise to anyone who watched the recent World Cup of Darts. Rock was in inspired form throughout the tournament, firing in a remarkable number of maximums and ultimately helping lead his nation, alongside Daryl Gurney, to victory in Frankfurt.

Josh Rock
As of the 21st of June, Josh Rock had hit an impressive 902 maximums, underlining his incredible ability to rack up big scores at a rapid pace. Alongside that, he’s claimed a couple of Players Championship titles across 2024 and 2025, as well as a European Tour victory in 2024.
ADVERTISEMENT
For Rock, there appears to be a clear link between his power scoring and his overall performance levels. Over the past 12 months, the Northern Irishman has posted a checkout percentage of 40.21%, showing that finishing isn’t a major weakness in his game. With that balance of scoring and finishing, he could soon find himself at the very top of the sport.
Read also
4 - Stephen Bunting
Following a disappointing Premier League campaign, Stephen Bunting will be the first to admit he fell short of expectations. Despite often averaging higher than his opponents, he struggled to convert that into wins, with his scoring power occasionally falling short against the very best in the game.
Stephen Bunting
ADVERTISEMENT
However, Bunting’s form in other events tells a different story. Over the past two years, he’s hit 936 maximums across Players Championship and Euro Tour events, a stat that reflects his growing consistency. This has translated into titles too, with a Players Championship win and a Euro Tour victory already under his belt in 2025. Add to that two World Series titles this year, and Bunting looks to be turning a corner.
While his Premier League results were underwhelming, the stats suggest he’s been somewhat unlucky. His checkout percentage of 40.34% ranks 28th in the world — far from poor, especially compared to some of the sport’s elite. As he targets the rest of the season, Bunting may well be on the verge of a breakthrough, aiming to build on his Masters title and claim further Major success.
Read also
3 - Dave Chisnall
The current world number 11, Dave Chisnall, has claimed third place on this list with an impressive tally of 977 maximums. Now closing in on the 1,000 mark, this stat is a clear testament to Chisnall’s consistency and longevity on tour. Despite not yet securing a Major title, his staggering number of 180s is an achievement in itself. Having featured in my list of the best players to never win a Major, Chisnall’s talent is undeniable — and if he can maintain this level of scoring, the future looks promising for the experienced pro.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Over the past two years, Dave Chisnall has picked up two European Tour titles and two Players Championship victories, using his impressive scoring power to secure wins. Still hovering around the top ten in the PDC Order of Merit, there’s every reason to believe Chisnall can push his way back into the sport’s elite.

Dave Chisnall
Unlike the other two players mentioned in this list, however, Chisnall’s checkout percentage currently sits below 40%, meaning he doesn’t rank inside the world’s top 32 in that category. If he can sharpen up on the outer ring, it could be the key to unlocking even greater success in the near future.
2 - Dirk Van Duijvenbode
ADVERTISEMENT
Our first player on the list to surpass the 1000 mark, Dirk van Duijvenbode has long been known for his explosive power scoring and lively stage presence. When the Dutchman is at his best, he’s a thrilling watch — peppering the treble 20 and finishing legs with big checkouts. However, recent injury struggles have meant we’ve seen fewer fireworks than we’ve come to expect from the part-time aubergine farmer.

Dirk Van Duijvenbode
Despite this, Van Duijvenbode has racked up an astonishing 1,040 maximums over the past two years. Remarkably, that figure might even be seen as slightly underwhelming given the expectations placed on him when he first broke through. Notably, Dirk hasn’t captured a ranking title in that time, again showing that scoring alone doesn’t always equate to tournament victories.
His checkout percentage of 38.83% is the lowest among those in this top-five list and may go some way in explaining why his scoring hasn’t translated into more consistent success in ranked events.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
1 - Ross Smith
If you’re a darts fan, then you’ll already be familiar with the incredible ability of Ross Smith. From his relentless power scoring to hitting nine-darters, Smith has demonstrated his wide-ranging talent time and again. When he’s playing at his best, there’s no doubt he can be a real challenge for any of the world’s top players.

Ross Smith
Topping this list with an incredible 1,099 maximums, Ross Smith is by far the most prolific 180 hitter in the game right now. He’s repeatedly shown glimpses of being a true star in the making — someone who could break through in a big way if he learns to capitalise on key moments in matches. Smith has lost in three European Tour finals over the past two years, but given his consistent power scoring, it feels inevitable that he’ll get over that line soon.
During the same period, he’s picked up two Players Championship titles, proving that finals aren’t a stumbling block he can’t overcome. With a checkout percentage of 40.85%, there’s strong evidence to suggest all parts of his game are close to clicking.
ADVERTISEMENT
If he continues on this trajectory, it wouldn’t be a surprise to see Smith push for a Premier League spot and compete for Major titles once again. The progress required seems minimal — just a few marginal gains — and if he makes them, another Major title could well be on the horizon within the next two-year cycle. Ross Smith is definitely one to watch.
Read also
Jack Clucas is a Multimedia Journalist with a growing presence in the world of sports media, specialising in Darts and expanding his reach into Tennis.
After earning his degree in Sports Journalism from Sheffield Hallam University, Jack gained valuable experience in radio broadcasting before transitioning into digital media. His work has since featured on platforms like DartsNews.com and TennisUpToDate.com, where he brings fresh perspective, editorial precision, and a passion for storytelling.
Now broadening his focus across a wider spectrum of sports—particularly tennis—Jack aims to combine his multimedia skillset with journalistic integrity to deliver insightful, engaging, and high-quality content for modern sports fans.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026









