"There have been plenty of more methodical players than me, like Dennis Priestley, Justin Pipe": Mickey Mansell pushes back on 'rivalry' with James Wade
PDC
As the darting calendar reaches its most intense stretch, Mickey Mansell finds himself in a familiar position: balancing disappointment with renewed purpose, and looking ahead to another opportunity on the biggest stage of all.
ADVERTISEMENT
From narrowly missing out on a Grand Slam return, the Northern Irishman sat down with Tungsten Tales to reflect on Wolverhampton, his career-defining perseverance, and the hunger that still drives him after a decade and a half in the PDC.
Grand Slam heartbreak — but confidence remains
Mansell’s run to the knockout stages of last year’s Grand Slam remains one of the finest moments of his career. Yet there will be no encore this year after a tight defeat to Mike De Decker in qualifying. “I felt confident and comfortable,” Mansell explains. “But Mike De Decker played very well. He took out 126 to go 4–2 up, and I was sitting on a finish. It sucked the life out of me.”
Despite the frustration, he holds no bitterness. “I’m disappointed, but I can’t complain. He played well — and then he ran into Conor Scott throwing four ton-plus averages. It happens.”
Still, the memories of last year linger. Mansell arrived in Wolverhampton then with belief after a superb qualifying run including wins over Matt Campbell, Raymond van Barneveld and Gerwyn Price. “I had 110 average against Campbell. Something just clicked that day,” he recalls. “This year I was playing well too. I was consistent. I felt good going into it.”
Big TV stages fuel bigger ambition
The Grand Slam group-stage format, where players are guaranteed three matches, proved invaluable for Mansell last year. "It gives you a chance to get your feet on the ground. In most TV events, lose your first game and you’re out. With the Grand Slam, you can find your feet and build,” he says. “It definitely helped going into the World Championship.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Mansell admits the allure of big-stage darts remains powerful. “You want to compete against the best to see how good you are. That’s where the hunger comes from.”
Read also
A surprise feud with James Wade — context and clarity
One of the more talked-about moments of last year’s Grand Slam was a small war of words between Mansell and James Wade.
“What do I remember? I remember he doesn’t remember me!” Mansell laughs. “Look, it was tongue in cheek; you can take it whatever way you want. James is James. I’ve too many things going on in my life to be worrying about him.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He explains how the group dynamics may have contributed. “The group would have been open and James probably thought he had an opportunity to top the group. Maybe when I beat him the thought process was totally different after that.”
Mansell isn’t sure what specifically sparked any irritation. “He probably expected to beat me. Then the group opened up when Rowby-John beat Luke Humphries — it changed everything. After I beat James, the thought process was different.”
On suggestions that his methodical pace caused irritation, Mansell pushes back and broadens the point. “James keeps telling everybody how long he’s been playing darts — he’s played against everybody. There have been plenty of more methodical players than me, like Dennis Priestley, Justin Pipe, who have had a lot more success, and James has played them too. You can’t play the game to suit your opponent — you have to play to suit yourself. Phil Taylor never said anyone was too fast or too slow — he just beat whoever was in front of him. Sometimes boys use it as an excuse.”
Mansell sums up with typical pragmatism: “It was tongue in cheek. Whatever James’ take is on the day, so be it — it’s just another game for me.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Players Championship Finals secured — and Worlds in sight
Despite missing the Grand Slam, Mansell’s season remains a success. He has qualified for the Players Championship Finals and sits inside the top 40 on the Order of Merit, guaranteeing his place at Alexandra Palace. “At the start of the year, bar the top 32, everyone is aiming for those two events,” he says. “Last year I didn’t qualify for the Players Championship Finals, so that was a goal. Thankfully I’m in.”
The increased prize money at the World Championship provides a valuable opportunity. “I’m well placed and looking forward to it, after the last couple of years and the eventful games I’ve had.”
Read also
Fifteen years on tour — and a career built the hard way
ADVERTISEMENT
January will mark 15 years since Mansell first earned his Tour Card, a milestone that still surprises him. “I was literally coming from pub league darts. I won a qualifier, got into the World Championship, and had about £3,500 to give Q School a go — the first-ever Q School. Chizzy, John Henderson, James Wade were all there, and I was a no-name.”
Winning a Tour Card should have been a breakthrough. Instead, it began years of stress and financial strain. “For six or seven years I was financing myself. £100 a tournament. I was winning money to go to the next tournament, no backing, no sponsorship. Looking back, it wasn’t ideal for a professional environment.”
He contrasts that with today’s landscape. “Now nearly everyone on the Challenge Tour and Development Tour is sponsored. No entry fees. It’s stress-free compared to seven or eight years ago. Back then, you had to perform to catch the eye of a sponsor.”
For Mansell survival was year-to-year. “I didn’t think I’d be here this long. There were no guarantees. I’ve played my way to stay here. I’m still hanging in.”
Seeing great players fall and refusing to follow
ADVERTISEMENT
Mansell has watched some of the sport’s biggest names leave the professional ranks in recent years. “Simon Whitlock dropping off the tour, Adrian Lewis, Premier League players like Mark Webster, Wes Newton… players younger than me,” he lists. “It’s strange how I’ve hung in. You see boys at the pinnacle, and how quick and dramatic the fall can be.”
He notes he started late compared with many. “I didn’t come on to the tour until I was 38. Wayne Mardle quit at 38. Colin Lloyd is the same age as me. I’ve had a career after their careers.”
Still driven and still believing
Despite everything, Mansell’s passion remains strong. “If I wasn’t playing in the PDC, I’d be at home playing tournaments. It’s about winning. Money’s a big thing, but you want to compete against the best to see how good you are.”
He believes one spark can change his trajectory again. “It only takes one day. I’ve seen so many boys get a run on the Pro Tour and everything changes. The belief is always there.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026









