“Watch this space...” - PDC boss Matt Porter teases long-debated refresh to Premier League Darts format
PDCPDC chief executive Matt Porter has hinted that changes to the Premier League Darts format could be considered, admitting the organisation does not want the weekly roadshow to become “repetitive” or “boring”.
ADVERTISEMENT
The 2026 campaign reaches its conclusion at the O2 Arena tonight, where Luke Littler, Jonny Clayton, Luke Humphries and Gerwyn Price will battle for the title after 16 regular league nights across the UK, Ireland and Europe.
The current format has again delivered packed arenas, major storylines and a final four that Porter believes fully deserve their place in London. But with debate around the weekly knockout structure continuing among fans, broadcasters and pundits, the PDC boss left the door open to future changes.
“Yeah, we discuss it all the time,” Porter told Sky Sports when asked about possible format tweaks. “This format has been in place for a number of years now. We don’t want it to get repetitive. We don’t want it to get boring.”
Read also
Porter admits Premier League format remains under review
The Premier League has used the nightly mini-tournament format since 2022, with eight players competing across 16 league nights before the top four progress to Finals Night.
It has created clear weekly winners and regular high-stakes matches, but it has also led to recurring debates over variety, repeated fixtures and whether the competition should be refreshed.
ADVERTISEMENT
Porter acknowledged the difficulty of pleasing both the live audience and regular TV viewers. “People look at it through different eyes,” he explained. “If you come to an arena once, you see it once. You want to see a winner on the night. You want to see that drama until the very last dart thrown."
“If you watch it every week on TV, some people want to see the best players playing each other every week. Others want to see a little bit of variety," he adds. “You’re never going to pick something that pleases everyone, but we always look at what we can do. So watch this space.”
That final line will naturally fuel fresh discussion over whether the PDC could alter the Premier League in future seasons, especially with demand for the sport continuing to grow.
The Premier League Darts trophy
Porter praises final four after 16-week race
ADVERTISEMENT
For now, the focus is on Finals Night, with Littler facing Price in one semi-final and Clayton taking on defending champion Humphries in the other.
Porter believes the final table has produced a worthy top four after a campaign that tested consistency, form and resilience across four months. “Ultimately, over 16 weeks, nobody can say that they’re not the four who deserved it,” he said. “They’ve had to show consistency. They’ve had to show brilliance. They’ve had to be able to dig it out when they’ve got tired, when the crowd maybe hasn’t been on their side as much as they would have liked. All those different scenarios that sports people get faced with, these are the guys who’ve delivered.”
Littler finished top after a dominant league phase, with Clayton second after one of the most consistent campaigns of his career. Humphries recovered from a difficult middle section to finish third, while Price held on to fourth despite recent concerns over form, health and withdrawals from other events.
Read also
Littler dominance not seen as a problem
ADVERTISEMENT
Porter was also asked about Littler’s continued dominance and whether one player winning so often could become a problem for the sport.
The PDC chief rejected that idea, arguing that fans want to see elite standards and that it is now up to the chasing pack to respond. “People want to see the best in the sport, don’t they?” Porter said. “Luke at the moment is the best in the sport, but there’s a big chasing pack. He hasn’t been the best for the whole period that he’s been around, but he has been for a lot of it. It’s up to the others to rise to his level and do so on a consistent basis.
“It’s certainly not boring. You watch people throw 110 averages, big checkouts, nine-dart finishes, whatever. No one can say that was boring," Porter insisted. “But it’s up to everybody else to hit that target that’s on his back.”
Porter also suggested Littler is motivated by the records and milestones now appearing in front of him. “You hear him say things about the most number of nightly wins, and he references different numbers of titles that he’s won and when he wins something for the first time,” he added. “I think he’s got those little challenges, and it’s almost like he’s got a list in his head and he’s just going through it one by one, ticking them off as he does them.”
“Don’t be the one who spoils it”
ADVERTISEMENT
Crowd behaviour has also been a recurring theme across this year’s Premier League, particularly after recent incidents involving whistling and deliberate attempts to disrupt players.
Porter made clear that while darts should remain a party atmosphere, there is a line that spectators should not cross. “There’s a lot of ways to enjoy yourself when you come to the darts, and disrupting the players doesn’t have to be one of them,” he said. “Most of the players, in fact all of them really, know how to deal with it. At different times and in different scenarios, they can deal with it to different levels."
“But it’s better if it doesn’t happen. Everyone who’s been, anyone who’s watched the sport on TV, knows what a great party atmosphere it can be," added Porter. “So don’t be the one who spoils it for everybody else.”
That message will carry into the O2, where the 2026 Premier League season ends with its strongest four players still standing and the wider future of the competition now once again part of the conversation.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026








