“What we did in Saudi Arabia is different, but we’re not going to copy it everywhere” – 'WWE walk-ons' won’t become the norm as PDC turn to other sports for inspiration
PDC
During the Saudi Arabia Darts Masters 2026 in Riyadh, Online Darts spoke at length with Jamie Banks, Head of Broadcast at the PDC. The conversation focused on change, innovation and, above all, why darts on television must look different in the coming years.
ADVERTISEMENT
A new era has begun with the broadcasting deal with ITV. Not just in terms of rights, but especially in content. “It’s a really exciting time for everyone involved in the sport,” says Banks. “The new deal has kicked in and it means we’ve got a bit more control over the product and the production."
Evolve or stand still
According to Banks, standing still is not an option. "We’re genuinely trying to evolve the product, move things on, not stand still, and improve the way people enjoy the sport on TV. That ambition is visible in almost every aspect of the new broadcasts: from the make-up of the presenting team to graphics, analysis and even walk-ons.
One of the first striking choices was appointing Pete Graves as presenter, known from Sky Sports. A name that was not at the top of the list initially. "He wasn’t necessarily on the radar for a long time, but he got pushed towards us. I had a conversation with him and immediately thought, “Actually, this is the guy.”
We wanted people with experience in the sport, but his knowledge really impressed me, and so did his desire to help us improve the product."
Read also
That decision also made it possible to deploy Gabriella Partington on the World Series. "That gives us two things: someone with loads of broadcasting experience and a strong understanding of the sport, and someone who’s still learning and getting a foot in the door.
She’s been around darts for a long time, but this gives her a chance to grow and build with us."
The most talked-about move is without doubt Wayne Mardle’s switch to ITV. “That conversation was really fun,” says Banks. "He’s fully on board and genuinely looking forward to getting involved." For Banks, bringing in Wayne Mardle is more than a personnel change as they look to level the playing field between Sky Sports and ITV. "Everyone loves Wayne, and it’s a great opportunity for us to use him across different events."
ADVERTISEMENT
Banks understands the varied reactions. "We’ve seen the comments, and I completely understand that people will have differing opinions — that’s just the nature of it." He likens it to football: It’s like supporting a football team. You might think the manager should stay, I might think he should go. It doesn’t mean one of us cares more." What he hopes for most is understanding. "Even if they don’t like a decision, I hope they can step back and see the bigger picture and say, 'I get why they’ve done that.'"
For darts fans, another dream beckons: Chris Mason and Wayne Mardle at the same desk. “That idea really excites me,” says Banks without hesitation. "They’re two of the best broadcasters in the sport. They have very different styles, but that doesn’t mean they can’t work together."
Banks believes it’s time to move away from old labels. "We now have the freedom to say, 'That person is best for this role,' and bring everyone together to create a team people can really enjoy."
New voices, fresh perspectives
New names are joining the commentary team as well. Mark Wilson and Ian Danter are making their debut at the highest TV level. On Wilson, Banks is clear: "We’ve worked with him for a couple of years and straight away I thought he had something. His knowledge of the sport has grown massively, and as a broadcaster he’s superb." He even calls Danter 'a real steal.' "He’s a brilliant broadcaster with plenty of experience. He’s done darts on talkSPORT, and while TV is different to radio, he’s absolutely superb."
ADVERTISEMENT
The same goes for Dan Dawson. “It wasn’t even a debate,” Banks laughs. “He’s one of the best broadcasters I’ve ever worked with and knows more about the sport than anybody else.” At the same time, the PDC is wary of overexposure. “We don’t want a ‘Dan Dawson Show’. Variety keeps it fresh.”
Read also
With former players like Glen Durrant, the PDC wants to add more depth. “It’s really important. The sport changes, we all know that. Durrant has been involved in the game recently and also has broadcasting experience, so he was a pretty easy decision.”
That fits a broader ambition: better analysis. “In the past we mostly talked about matches,” Banks says. “Now we want to show what’s happening.” Luke Littler’s rise has changed the audience. “We have a younger demographic, a new crowd. That calls for explanation and context.”
The new graphics, introduced at tournaments in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, sparked debate. Banks remains calm. “I personally approved them because I think they’re good. They provide a different look and are aimed at a broader audience.” He knows social media is no yardstick. “If you read comments all day, you get nowhere. Change takes time. Give it a chance.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Littler won the very first edition of the Saudi Arabia Darts Masters.
Inspiration from other sports
For further innovation, the PDC is deliberately looking beyond darts. “We’re taking elements from other sports. Formula 1 is very consistent in its look and feel. Cricket, and even The Hundred, show how graphics can evolve.”
WWE is also an inspiration, especially for walk-ons. “What we did here in Saudi Arabia is different, but we won’t copy it everywhere. We also have to consider the audience in the arena.” At events like the PDC World Matchplay, Banks sees opportunities. “With lighting and cameras, you can do a lot without losing the sport’s identity.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Banks stresses that the new direction is not a reckoning with the past. “ITV has done fantastic work over the past twenty years. We’re not tearing anything down. We’re building on that success, but want to make it better.”
Finally, he addresses the fans. "The key thing is that we’re listening — to staff, talent, and fans. We’re going to make mistakes and there will be differing opinions.
All I ask is that people understand we’re trying to create a more rounded experience for everyone. Keep voicing opinions — I’m just fortunate that mine end up on the TV."

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026








