Phil Taylor warns top darts players for Michael van Gerwen: “No pressure — he’ll be tough to beat."
PDC
With the PDC World Darts Championship set to commence shortly, Phil Taylor is looking at the event with excitement and intrigue. In an interview with Online Darts, he named his predicted finalists while also stating that the big players clash too often, with the 'magic' fading from these appetising matchups.
ADVERTISEMENT
The darting world is set to be immersed in fierce competition, with one lucky player set to leave North London with a staggering £1 million. The tension and pressure will be as high as it ever has been, with Taylor set to watch it all play out in his home.
"Yeah, I do. I mean, the World Championship… I’ve enjoyed the darts all year, to be honest, with all the fresh faces and everything," Taylor began. "Plus, there’s a nice rivalry — you’ve got the two Lukes. It’s a bit like me and Barney [van Barneveld] at the time, or me and Dennis [Priestley]. You need that rivalry, and I’m enjoying it.
And some of the professionals now are clinging on by their fingertips, so that’s going to be interesting to see in this World Championship. There’ll be a lot of tears, a lot of arguments backstage, I think, but it’s interesting.
When I watch it — I mean, I’ve got a big television — but when I sit here and watch it, I can tell what’s going through their minds. I know when they’re under pressure at certain times.
Darts has been my life anyway, so it’s been great, and I’m really looking forward to the Worlds this time — more than ever, to be honest."
Pressure? What pressure?
Taylor had shrugged off any pressure that the top two players could be feeling. "I think Luke Humphries is just building himself up nice and steady. He seems relaxed," Taylor said. "Luke Littler is that chilled he could fall asleep on his feet. He’s a lovely kid — I love him to bits — but he’s so relaxed, and he’s going to be dangerous.
Whether he retains it? I’ve tipped that he will. If I’m honest, it’ll be one of the Lukes that wins it — Luke Humphries or Luke Littler. It’ll be interesting."
Read also
The 16-time World champion admitted that the spotlight not being on him was a nice feeling for a change. "I was in Finland last week with them. Where I used to be the main man, now you’re not — you’ve passed the sword on.
It’s nice because you get left alone more; the pressure isn’t on you to perform anymore."
Watching the two Luke's play has even motivated Taylor to get back to the board. "Even though my sponsor Gary Plummer set me up because I said I’m going to have a bit of practise — watching them over the weekend, I thought, 'I’d love to have a throw now.' So I told Bob: order me some darts and a board. I’m going to practise again."
ADVERTISEMENT
Littler above the rest
Taylor continued to heap the praise on the world number one. "Amazing — absolutely amazing.
He reminds me of Coventry City at the minute — flying," he stated. "Every time he goes a leg or two down, he kicks in.
He’s got that extra gear — that’s what I had.
Any player playing him needs to be consistent.
At the minute, Luke Humphries can match him, and Josh Rock can match him — but they’ve got to keep that pressure going."
Inevitably, Littler will have a dip in form, but 'The Power' has brushed this concern off. "I think he’ll be fine.
He’s enjoying himself. He works a lot, but he’s not killing himself on the board.
Whatever he’s doing, he’s doing right.
He’s not money-motivated — he’s only 18.
Once he has a wife and family, he’ll have to be motivated by money, but right now he’s with his parents and having a good life."
Luke Littler is the defending champion at the PDC World Darts Championship
Humphries achievements overshadowed by 'The Nuke'
ADVERTISEMENT
Despite becoming world champion and number one in 2024, it seems that all the headlines were focused on Littler coming out of Alexandra Palace. As a 16-year-old, he became an overnight sensation, launching darts into a new stratosphere of popularity. From them, the duo have continued to battle. Humphries has won a number of major titles, but it seems that it has been down played due to the achievements of Littler.
"Humphries is such a nice person — too nice, if that makes sense," Taylor acknowledged. "He needs that little bit of aggression. You can see it in his face, but he doesn’t come across aggressive.
He and his wife Kayleigh are lovely.
But to be a multiple world champion, you sometimes need a naughty streak."
On whether he could be a multiple world champion, Taylor said: "100% — he’s after it.
He’s focused now. Even in the practise room, he’s serious. He’s getting ready."
Read also
Van Gerwen no longer in the spotlight
ADVERTISEMENT
It seems like ages since Michael van Gerwen has gone to Alexandra Palace not firmly in the favourites camp. With attention drawn to other in from players, the 'Green Machine' has been overlooked by many due to his poor and inconsistent form on the oche. Despite this, Taylor is not ruling out the three-time world champion of a run in the World Championship.
"I think he’s enjoying it.
He’s had personal problems, but watching him at the weekend, he’s cracking jokes — back to being a bit of a Jack the Lad," Taylor said. "He’ll be a force.
If people take their eye off him, he’ll relax. No pressure — he’ll be tough to beat."
Anderson and Wright chances of success
Other former world champions returning include Gary Anderson, who was the last player to defend his world title. However, he is not the same player he was back in 2016. "I think we’ve seen the best of him," Taylor ruefully confessed. "His age is creeping up, his eyesight isn’t the same.
He can still win it, but it’ll be difficult."
ADVERTISEMENT
Another Scot, Peter Wright, has had his fair share of struggles on the oche. While there has been moments of brilliance, it is normally marred by distinctively average performances which has seen him drop down the pecking order. While the form may have dissolved, the belief is still there to win a third world title, something Taylor is a fan of. "If your mind isn’t right, you won’t win.
He believes he can win it, and that makes me smile.
We’ll see next week," he said.
Rivalries are important - but not every week
"It’s great.
Look at TV — when there’s drama, the viewing figures go up," Taylor stated. He had been in a few in his time at the pinnacle of darts, from Eric Bristow to Raymond van Barneveld. These were special matches which brought in a number of fans to watch. However, the 65-year-old admitted that they should not be held every week.
"You need rivalries — but not every week, or it loses impact," he continued. "Me vs Raymond used to be huge, but when we played weekly in the Premier League it lost a bit of magic."
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Extortionate rise in prize money
The headline going into the World Championship this year is the fact that the winner will receive a whopping £1 million. The tally has doubled from £500,000 claimed by Littler last year, and has got many players motivated to bring their best game to the Palace.
"Imagine throwing for a million quid.
When I played it was £500,000.
Barry always said he wanted it to be a million — he’s done it.
Wouldn’t surprise me if he boosts it to £10 million," Taylor joked.
With this on offer, the question remains on who will be taking it home with them. From 128 players to choose from, Taylor was always going to lean towards Littler and Humphries, with Josh Rock another player thrown into the hat.
"I think it’s a toss-up between a few:
Josh Rock, Luke Humphries, Luke Littler, and Michael (van Gerwen).
Peter Wright says he’s going to win it, but it’ll be tough.
My prediction?
Maybe the two Lukes in the final, or Josh," he concluded.
ADVERTISEMENT

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







