PDC World Darts Championship 2020 preview and schedule: Monday December 30, semi-finals
PDC World Darts Championship
Two people are about to end 2019 in the best possible way; by reaching the PDC World Darts Championship final.
ADVERTISEMENT
We've whittled 96 candidates all the way down to four. After the early flurry of shocks, it didn't seem like we'd have four seeds in the semi-finals. But numbers one, three, seven and 12 have proved themselves the cream of the crop. There's Michael van Gerwen, a 5-2 winner over Darius Labanauskas; Gerwyn Price, aiming for a third consecutive major final; Peter Wright, who is back in the semis after two barren years; and Nathan Aspinall, into his second consecutive World Darts Championship semi-final. Let battle commence.
Price on cusp of destiny
No need to preview this one. Gerwyn Price has already said he'll beat Peter Wright 6-0. We'll leave it there.
Both players head into this semi-final in excellent shape. Price was pushed to the wire by Glen Durrant in the first set; after that, despite surrendering one set, the Welshman cantered clear. An average of just under a ton highlights a strong performance. Although he's in a World Darts Championship semi-final for the first time, there's no suggestion that Price will feel the heat. He's had plenty of recent practice being in the latter stages of majors, and simply oozes confidence. He also has the psychological advantage of harking back to that incredible Grand Slam final stuffing of his Ally Pally opponent. The Iceman has flitted between on and off days thus far; now's the time for some consistency, otherwise he could face a real battle.
Wright joked that he'd be facing Durrant here, but alas, it's Price. Nobody will worry Snakebite if he can play as he did against Luke Humphries. He's not the most prolific maximum-hitter on the Tour, but Wright piled in a superb 12 of them en route to a 5-3 win. His match average - 105.86 - was the second-best of the tournament, and over eight sets. Wright relishes the long game, and won't panic if Price piles on an early advantage. A finalist six years ago, it's about time that the Scot stepped up and beat the very best to the title. It'll be a tough ask to do that here, especially if Price is in that steamrollering mood, but Wright will have an eye on that final.
Also, if anyone wants a sweepstake on when a commentator will make the obvious "the Price is Wright" pun, give me a shout. I'm giving it two minutes.
ADVERTISEMENT
Asp out to go one better
The first game of the decade was Phil Taylor 5-0 Adrian Lewis in the World Darts Championship quarter-finals. The world number one averaged 107 and laid down a claim on a title he'd ultimately win, seeing off a hugely promising English star in the process. A young Michael van Gerwen was edged out in the second round of the 2010 championships. And now here we are in the last game of the decade, with van Gerwen as that dominance-seeking top dog, and Nathan Aspinall filling the Lewis role.
Mighty Mike has the knack of looking like he's not playing that well, when in fact he's doing brilliantly. A display against Darius Labanauskas that looked mediocre at first actually yielded a 99.5 average and a respectable 45 per cent success rate on the doubles. It's just that the Dutchman sets so high a bar that conceding three sets seems like a worry. In reality, he's well set to keep grinding his way to yet another big final. Van Gerwen claimed he found the Labanauskas game "a bit boring"; he won't have that same problem against Aspinall, with a World Darts Championship final place on the line.
There's something very endearing about Aspinall's emotional displays after winning on the Ally Pally stage. It's hard to imagine that the Asp has ever found a match boring in all his life. On Sunday, Dimitri van den Bergh did his best to quicken the pulse with a stirring fightback. Aspinall will undoubtedly be concerned at how his finishing abandoned him at key stages in that match, and how flat his game looked when the trademark heavy scoring wasn't there. However, he ultimately performed well enough to beat another top player, and has the capacity to do a lot more.
Van Gerwen is, of course, the favourite. And as Aspinall learned a year ago against Michael Smith, even averaging a ton over six or more sets can yield nothing if your opponent's in even better form. But those calling this a foregone conclusion might do well to remember how a certain underdog shocked the world number one a couple of years ago. If Mighty Mike wants to start the 2020s with a world title as Phil Taylor did in 1990, 2000 and 2010, he'll have to stay switched on throughout.
ADVERTISEMENT
PDC World Darts Championship 2020 schedule
Monday December 30
Evening session (1900 GMT start)
Semi-finals
19:15 Gerwyn Price vs Peter Wright
21:15 Michael van Gerwen vs Nathan Aspinall
21:15 Michael van Gerwen vs Nathan Aspinall
ADVERTISEMENT
Click here for more information on the PDC World Darts Championship, which takes place at the Alexandra Palace between December 13 and January 1.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






