Dimitri Van den Bergh on Luke Littler, World Darts Championship hopes, and the British obsession he can’t stand
PDC
After a two-month spell away from competitive action, Dimitri Van den Bergh has returned to the oche with renewed energy and a clear sense of purpose. The 30-year-old Belgian, affectionately known as 'The DreamMaker', made his comeback at the World Cup of Darts, teaming up with compatriot Mike De Decker to represent Belgium on the international stage.
ADVERTISEMENT
Since then, Van den Bergh has featured in three Players Championship events as well as a European Tour qualifier. While the results have been modest — a fourth-round run, a third-round exit, an early departure, and failure to qualify for the European Tour — there are signs the former World Matchplay champion is gearing up for a strong second half of the season.
As part of his return, Van den Bergh recently paid a visit to the UK headquarters of Target Darts, the manufacturer that has supplied his equipment since 2022. The visit doubled as a media and sponsorship day, with fellow Target stars Luke Littler, Josh Rock, and Stephen Bunting also on the books.
Read also
During his time there, Van den Bergh took part in a light-hearted but refreshingly honest 20 Questions interview with talkSPORT, offering fans a glimpse into his personality beyond the oche.
Among the more amusing revelations? He can’t stand Worcestershire sauce, and he’s utterly perplexed by the British obsession with peas. “There’s just no flavour,” he joked. “Please, just leave them off the plate!”
On the flip side, Van den Bergh showed his love for Fast & Furious films (yes, he’s a Vin Diesel fan), darts at Ally Pally, Bruno Mars, and football — with his allegiances split between Royal Antwerp and Arsenal. In a particularly memorable moment, he even gave a spirited rendition of Bruno Mars' Grenade, live during the interview.

Dimitri Van den Bergh
ADVERTISEMENT
Respect for Littler, Bond with Rowby-John
The Belgian ace also spoke warmly about his long-standing friendship with Rowby-John Rodriguez: “I’ve got a bunch of really good friends in darts,” he said. “But one of my best mates is Rowby-John Rodriguez — Rusty’s older brother."
“We’ve known each other a long time, ever since the Europe Cup Youth. I think we were 15 and 16 back then, so yeah — I’ve known him for half my life.”
Van den Bergh also took a moment to reflect on the extraordinary rise of his fellow Target stablemate, Luke Littler, whose rapid ascent to the top of the sport has left a lasting impression on fans and players alike. “For me, it’s all about respect — for what he is and what he does,” Van den Bergh said. “It’s amazing to see such raw talent. He plays with so much smoothness, so much ease — and he’s just relentless."
“You can see it in his demeanour — there’s nothing clouding his mind when he plays. He’s not a parent, he doesn’t have big responsibilities yet — he’s just focused on darts, and he’s already given himself and his family an amazing life. Hats off to him.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Van den Bergh has witnessed Littler’s meteoric rise first-hand and finds it remarkable how the teenager has handled the spotlight. “What he’s done in the last 12 months is incredible. Even before then, I saw him growing into a proper star — then he came into the PDC, qualified for the Worlds, smashed in a huge average against Andrew Gilding, and powered all the way to the final," he recalls. “A year later, he wins it. Then he wins the Premier League. At 17 or 18 years old — imagine that. He’s just turned 18 and already a millionaire, and on top of that, an unbelievable darts player.”
What impresses Van den Bergh the most is Littler’s consistency under pressure. “He just fires out a 12-darter like it’s nothing. Effortless. And when he does miss, it’s usually just a double. He doesn’t give you many chances," he explains. “I’ve got to be honest — I’ve never seen anyone this complete at his age. That’s the key detail: at his age. It’s something truly special.”
Read also
Eyes on the Ally Pally
Van den Bergh also expressed enthusiasm for the PDC’s revamped World Darts Championship format, which will now see a record 128 players start — up from 96 — and all from round 1 as well, with no protection for the seeds, along with a significant increase in prize money.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I have to say, what the PDC is doing is really exciting,” he said. “They’ve increased the field from 96 to 128 players, so there are a lot more players involved — but there’s also a lot more money to be won," says the Belgian. “It hasn’t happened yet, so it’s going to be something unique. I’m very curious to see how it plays out. Of course, anyone can lose — but anyone can win too. There’s always a flip side, and that’s what makes it so interesting.”
Following a short but seemingly restorative break, Van den Bergh appears reinvigorated as he looks to carve out a fresh chapter in his career. With the PDC World Darts Championship looming on the horizon, don’t be surprised if The DreamMaker reasserts himself among the sport’s elite before the year is out.
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026








