PDC Order of Merit Update | Michael van Gerwen threatens 13-year first, Gary Anderson poses potential Premier League problem
PDCThe quarter-finalists at the 2026 PDC World Darts Championship are set. Eight players will, after the turn of the year, battle it out to be crowned world champion. There is also plenty to gain in this phase on the PDC Order of Merit. The deeper we go into the tournament, the steeper the prize money climbs. Who can finish where, and which players should start to worry?
ADVERTISEMENT
All eight players who have reached the quarter-finals are already guaranteed £100,000. The four who make the semi-finals will receive £200,000. The runner-up doubles that and banks £400,000, but the winner hits the jackpot. For the first time in history, the world champion will pocket a staggering £1,000,000. That could vault you straight into the world’s top three.
The eight players still in the hunt for that million are Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, Jonny Clayton, Gian van Veen, Gary Anderson, Ryan Searle, Krzysztof Ratajski, and Justin Hood. Not much will change for Littler and Humphries. Littler leads comfortably with total earnings of £1,870,500, and can only lose his No. 1 spot if he loses in the quarters or semis and Humphries then becomes world champion. “Cool Hand Luke” in turn does not really need to fear a big drop. He currently sits on £1,172,000, almost £500,000 more than No. 3 Michael van Gerwen. Humphries can drop a maximum of one place if he does not win the world title himself, and then only if one of the other six wins the championship.
Read also
Van Gerwen's World No.3 spot under threat
Then there is Michael van Gerwen’s No. 3 position. The Dutchman became world No. 1 for the first time after his maiden world title in 2014. He held that spot until January 2, 2021, when Gerwyn Price dethroned him. Since then, however, “Mighty Mike” has always remained inside the world’s top three. That could now change for the first time in 11(!) years. The Dutchman sits on £691,250, with Jonny Clayton and compatriot Gian van Veen breathing down his neck. If both Clayton and Van Veen win their quarter-finals, they will each leapfrog Van Gerwen, dropping him to fifth. If both lose their last-eight ties, the Dutchman can only be knocked off third if Gary Anderson reaches at least the final, or if Searle, Ratajski, or Hood becomes world champion. The latter scenario, however, seems highly unlikely.
Read also
Van Gerwen therefore has serious reason to fear Clayton and Van Veen. On top of that, the Dutchman has a huge amount of prize money to defend next year. In 2024 he reached the finals at the Masters and the World Matchplay, and also made the quarter-finals at the Worlds. If he fails to rediscover his form next year, Van Gerwen could slide even further than a possible fifth place this year.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Gerwen could fall out of the world’s top four for the first time in 13 years.
For Jonny Clayton, this Worlds has not changed a great deal on the rankings yet. The Welshman started the tournament as world No. 6 and has since climbed one spot to No. 5. If he wins his quarter-final, he could move up one more place, but that seems the limit. To go second in the world, he would need to win the Worlds. Gian van Veen has already climbed five places thanks to his fine run and now sits fifth, just behind “The Ferret.” The Dutchman also has room to rise. He must beat Humphries in his quarter-final and hope Clayton loses. If Van Veen were to win the world title, he would be assured of the No. 2 spot in the world rankings.
Gary Anderson likely to provide Premier League problems
And then there’s the PDC’s “enfant terrible”: Gary Anderson. The Scot has proven at this Worlds that he remains a world-class player and has climbed from 14th to 11th on the Order of Merit. For now, that creates no issues for the PDC, but what if he goes much deeper? Or even becomes world champion? If “The Flying Scotsman” beats Hood in his quarter-final, he will at least be guaranteed sixth in the rankings. And if he then also reaches the final, he could even break into the top four. Then the PDC has a problem. Normally the world’s top four are assured of a Premier League spot, but the 55-year-old Anderson has repeatedly stated that he has no interest in it and would decline the invitation, even if he becomes world champion. So the question is what the PDC will do if the Scot lands his third world title this tournament.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
For the other three quarter-finalists, this is already a fine tournament, but there are still serious moves to be made on the world rankings. Ryan Searle has already climbed seven places and is now 13th. If he beats Jonny Clayton, he would rise even further to No. 7. Ratajski started the tournament as world No. 37, has played his way into the top 32, and currently sits 28th. If he wants to climb further, he must overcome world champion Luke Littler. Not impossible, but very tough. If he does pull it off, he would jump another nine places to No. 19.
And then the last quarter-finalist. The man of the moment and surprise package of this tournament: Justin Hood. No one, absolutely no one, factored in “Happy Feet” before the tournament. But the diminutive Englishman stunned everyone, firing four matches at or over a 100 average and beating big names like Danny Noppert and Josh Rock as if it were the most normal thing in the world. Hood started the tournament ranked 86th in the world, but has already climbed 36 places to number 50. And why shouldn’t there be even more to come? He faces Gary Anderson in the quarter-finals, which looks tough on paper. Then again, what can’t Justin Hood do at this tournament? If he can beat Noppert and Rock, Anderson should be within reach. If he manages to reach the semi-finals he will climb further to 37th and, on World Championship prize money alone, be within touching distance of the top 32.
Since the last update during the Christmas break, several players have been eliminated but still made significant moves on the world rankings. Take 20-year-old Charlie Manby. The Englishman without a Tour Card climbed no fewer than 85 places at this Worlds thanks to his run to the fourth round and now sits 81st. Sweden’s Andreas Harrysson also reached the last 16 without a Tour Card and jumped 41 spots to 73rd. Despite an excellent Worlds, both will still have to go to Q-School to fight for their Tour Card.
Josh Rock lost to Hood in the fourth round, but still rose to seventh in the world at this Worlds. Woodhouse also just missed out on the quarter-finals and stayed 21st, a rise of four places. Finally, James Hurrell is worth mentioning. The Englishman beat Stephen Bunting in the third round but then lost to Searle. Even so, this strong result lifted him 15 places and he currently occupies 48th on the Order of Merit.
PDC Order of Merit as of 31/12/25
ADVERTISEMENT
| Rk | +/- | Name | Prize money |
| 1 | Luke Littler | 1870.5 | |
| 2 | Luke Humphries | 1172 | |
| 3 | Michael van Gerwen | 691.25 | |
| 4 | 1 | Jonny Clayton | 625 |
| 5 | 5 | Gian van Veen | 612.5 |
| 6 | -2 | Stephen Bunting | 593.75 |
| 7 | 4 | Josh Rock | 555.5 |
| 8 | -2 | Danny Noppert | 550.75 |
| 9 | -2 | James Wade | 544.25 |
| 10 | -1 | Gerwyn Price | 521 |
| 11 | 3 | Gary Anderson | 509.5 |
| 12 | -4 | Chris Dobey | 505.25 |
| 13 | 7 | Ryan Searle | 468 |
| 14 | 1 | Nathan Aspinall | 460 |
| 15 | -2 | Martin Schindler | 458.25 |
| 16 | -4 | Ross Smith | 447.75 |
| 17 | -1 | Damon Heta | 439 |
| 18 | 1 | Jermaine Wattimena | 423 |
| 19 | -1 | Mike De Decker | 413.5 |
| 20 | -3 | Rob Cross | 389 |
| 21 | 4 | Luke Woodhouse | 383 |
| 22 | -1 | Dave Chisnall | 362.5 |
| 23 | -1 | Daryl Gurney | 346.5 |
| 24 | Ryan Joyce | 345 | |
| 25 | -2 | Dimitri Van den Bergh | 335.25 |
| 26 | Cameron Menzies | 325.25 | |
| 27 | Ritchie Edhouse | 324 | |
| 28 | 9 | Krzysztof Ratajski | 322.5 |
| 29 | 2 | Wessel Nijman | 320.75 |
| 30 | -1 | Dirk van Duijvenbode | 319.75 |
| 31 | -1 | Peter Wright | 311.5 |
| 32 | -4 | Michael Smith | 303.5 |
| 33 | 1 | Andrew Gilding | 300 |
| 34 | -1 | Ricardo Pietreczko | 293 |
| 35 | -3 | Joe Cullen | 275 |
| 36 | -1 | Raymond van Barneveld | 246 |
| 37 | 1 | Martin Lukeman | 226.5 |
| 38 | 3 | Kevin Doets | 219 |
| 39 | 4 | Callan Rydz | 189 |
| 40 | Ricky Evans | 188 | |
| 41 | -2 | Brendan Dolan | 183.25 |
| 42 | 2 | Niels Zonneveld | 182.75 |
| 43 | -1 | William O'Connor | 182.25 |
| 44 | -8 | Scott Williams | 173.75 |
| 45 | 1 | Madars Razma | 162.5 |
| 46 | -1 | Mickey Mansell | 159.25 |
| 47 | Gabriel Clemens | 154.25 | |
| 48 | 15 | James Hurrell | 147 |
| 49 | 1 | Connor Scutt | 144.75 |
| 50 | 36 | Justin Hood | 139.75 |
| 51 | -2 | Jeffrey de Graaf | 139.5 |
| 52 | -1 | Ian White | 134.5 |
| 53 | 1 | Alan Soutar | 131.5 |
| 54 | -2 | Niko Springer | 129.75 |
| 55 | 5 | Mensur Suljovic | 127.75 |
| 56 | 6 | Ryan Meikle | 125.5 |
| 57 | -9 | Richard Veenstra | 117.25 |
| 58 | -3 | Keane Barry | 116.25 |
| 59 | -2 | Nick Kenny | 114.5 |
| 60 | -7 | Kim Huybrechts | 108 |
| 61 | 4 | Dom Taylor | 107.5 |
| 62 | -1 | Thibault Tricole | 106.25 |
| 63 | 1 | Lukas Wenig | 101.25 |
| 64 | -6 | Rob Owen | 95.5 |
| 65 | 1 | Mario Vandenbogaerde | 94.75 |
| 66 | 1 | Stephen Burton | 93.75 |
| 67 | -8 | Matt Campbell | 85.25 |
| 68 | 2 | Karel Sedlacek | 83 |
| 69 | 2 | Chris Landman | 82.25 |
| 70 | 5 | Darren Beveridge | 79.75 |
| 71 | 1 | Bradley Brooks | 78.75 |
| 71 | -15 | Florian Hempel | 78.75 |
| 73 | 41 | Andreas Harrysson | 77.75 |
| 74 | Cam Crabtree | 73 | |
| 75 | 17 | Wesley Plaisier | 68.5 |
| 76 | Steve Lennon | 68.25 | |
| 77 | Matthew Dennant | 67.25 | |
| 78 | Andy Baetens | 67 | |
| 79 | -10 | Dylan Slevin | 66.75 |
| 80 | -1 | Sebastian Bialecki | 63.75 |
| 81 | 85 | Charlie Manby | 62.5 |
| 82 | -9 | Jose de Sousa | 59 |
| 83 | 10 | Max Hopp | 58.25 |
| 84 | -3 | Owen Bates | 57.25 |
| 85 | -3 | Adam Lipscombe | 56.75 |
| 86 | -2 | Adam Hunt | 56 |
| 87 | -19 | Jim Williams | 52 |
| 88 | 7 | Darius Labanauskas | 46.75 |
| 89 | 8 | Haupai Puha | 44.5 |
| 90 | 8 | Dominik Gruellich | 44.25 |
| 91 | 20 | Stefan Bellmont | 43.75 |
| 92 | -12 | Rhys Griffin | 43.5 |
| 93 | -11 | Berry van Peer | 41.75 |
| 94 | 9 | Cor Dekker | 41.25 |
| 95 | -10 | Patrick Geeraets | 40.25 |
| 96 | -9 | Robert Grundy | 39.25 |
| 97 | -9 | Nathan Rafferty | 38.75 |
| 97 | -9 | Jitse Van der Wal | 38.75 |
| 99 | -9 | Radek Szaganski | 38.25 |
| 100 | 66 | Arno Merk | 37.5 |
| 101 | -10 | Jelle Klaasen | 34.75 |
| 102 | -8 | Martijn Dragt | 33 |
| 103 | 12 | Jamai van den Herik | 32.5 |
| 104 | 12 | Jurjen van der Velde | 32.25 |
| 105 | -10 | Danny Lauby | 31.75 |
| 106 | 39 | David Davies | 31 |
| 106 | 14 | Beau Greaves | 31 |
| 108 | -9 | William Borland | 28 |
| 108 | -9 | Benjamin Reus | 28 |
| 110 | 15 | Mervyn King | 27.5 |
| 110 | -9 | Brett Claydon | 27.5 |
| 112 | -10 | George Killington | 27 |
| 113 | -9 | Maik Kuivenhoven | 26 |
| 113 | -9 | Andy Boulton | 26 |
| 115 | New | Adam Sevada | 25 |
| 115 | New | David Munyua | 25 |
| 115 | New | Joe Comito | 25 |
| 115 | New | Jonny Tata | 25 |
| 115 | New | Leonard Gates | 25 |
| 115 | New | Motomu Sakai | 25 |
| 115 | New | Nitin Kumar | 25 |
| 115 | New | Paul Lim | 25 |
| 115 | 16 | Ted Evetts | 25 |
| 124 | 9 | Tavis Dudeney | 24.5 |
| 124 | 9 | Oskar Lukasiak | 24.5 |
| 126 | -20 | Darryl Pilgrim | 24.25 |
| 127 | 10 | Boris Krcmar | 24 |
| 128 | 14 | Alexis Toylo | 23 |
| 129 | -22 | Michele Turetta | 21 |
| 130 | -22 | Tom Bissell | 20.25 |
| 131 | 18 | Alex Spellman | 20 |
| 131 | 18 | Lisa Ashton | 20 |
| 131 | -22 | Christian Kist | 20 |
| 134 | -24 | Leon Weber | 19.75 |
| 135 | -23 | Dennie Olde Kalter | 18.5 |
| 136 | -23 | Joshua Richardson | 18.25 |
| 137 | 29 | Teemu Harju | 17.5 |
| 138 | -22 | Jim Long | 17.25 |
| 138 | -22 | Thomas Lovely | 17.25 |
| 138 | -22 | Marvin van Velzen | 17.25 |
| 141 | 39 | Adam Gawlas | 16.25 |
| 142 | -22 | Viktor Tingstrom | 16 |
| 143 | -21 | Adam Warner | 15.5 |
| 144 | New | Cristo Reyes | 15 |
| 144 | New | David Cameron | 15 |
| 144 | New | Fallon Sherrock | 15 |
| 144 | New | Gemma Hayter | 15 |
| 144 | New | Jesus Salate | 15 |
| 144 | New | Krzysztof Kciuk | 15 |
| 144 | New | Lourence Ilagan | 15 |
| 144 | New | Man Lok Leung | 15 |
| 144 | New | Mitsuhiko Tatsunami | 15 |
| 144 | New | Noa-Lynn van Leuven | 15 |
| 144 | New | Paolo Nebrida | 15 |
| 144 | New | Patrik Kovacs | 15 |
| 144 | New | Ryusei Azemoto | 15 |
| 144 | New | Simon Whitlock | 15 |
| 144 | New | Stowe Buntz | 15 |
| 144 | New | Tim Pusey | 15 |
| 144 | New | Xiaochen Zong | 15 |

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







