
"The PDC doesn't have too much history, as we're quite a young organisation," admits Matt Porter. "But the World Matchplay being in Blackpool is up there with everything that epitomises the organisation."
ADVERTISEMENT
This theme permeates our exclusive dartsnews.com interview with Porter, the PDC Chief Executive. In a calendar that is now jam-packed with high quality events played at big venues (for significant prize money), the Matchplay still stands head and shoulders above the crowd. A big part of that is the location, Blackpool's opulent Winter Gardens.
"It's a beautiful venue with a story of its own, and the event is a perfect fit there. It's probably our most traditional tournament, and to play it in a traditional venue that players and fans alike love, is a perfect combination," Porter adds.
As he mentions, the PDC is still young - 2019 sees the Matchplay played out for just the 26th time. It means that history is still in the making. And with a frightening depth of talent involved this year, could it be the most open edition in its developing legacy?
"Certainly, yes," Porter enthuses.
"Michael van Gerwen is obviously the number one and favourite, but he has not had it all his own way recently, and the best players raise their game on the biggest stages.
"So don't be surprised to see some special darts from the top ranked players and a few lesser-known characters emerge to create their own headlines."
New faces
ADVERTISEMENT
Mixing it with the top names in Blackpool for the first time are seven debutants. Even they - Nathan Aspinall, Glen Durrant, Jamie Hughes, Danny Noppert, Chris Dobey, Ricky Evans and Krzysztof Ratajski - are big names in the game.
"It's vitally important that we have a turnover of players in order to keep the product fresh. The wave of new talent coming through now is fantastic to see," said Porter.
"There is huge competition outside the top 16 for a seat at the top table and it's fascinating to watch it unfold. But as impressive as it is to quality, the real skill is to be able to stay there and establish yourself in the elite - that's when you really see the cream rising to the top."
Jetlag
There were concerns last year that the 'product' had been affected by World Series trips to Shanghai and Las Vegas in the immediate run-up, even though eventual champion Gary Anderson was at both. Porter offered a diplomatic defence to that suggestion, but also accentuated the positives of events preceding this year's event being staged in Cologne and Barnsley.
ADVERTISEMENT
"It was a factor we considered, but it wasn't something that we decided absolutely had to happen," said Porter on the schedule switch.
"Players had at least a week to get over the travelling before - it wasn't as if the Matchplay started 24 hours after they got back.
"But it certainly won't hurt that there has been no long haul travel immediately beforehand, and no-one will be able to use it as an excuse!"
Special moments
ADVERTISEMENT
Porter has been the PDC's Chief Executive for more than a decade. But his love of the Matchplay is palpable, and the excitement for events to come is implicit, even as the 39-year-old looks back on his favourite memories of the event.
"I love the special atmosphere that the venue generates - it sounds like a cliché, but a combination of the appearance of the venue, the summer weather, the crowds enjoying their holiday and the nerves that you can feel from the players when they walk through the stage door all combine to make it a special event.
"Last year's final was very dramatic of course, and there have been some real showstopping moments such as Colin Lloyd's 170 finish to win the trophy, Michael van Gerwen's nine-darter against Steve Beaton to kickstart his career and Andy Hamilton's remarkable comeback against Simon Whitlock," Porter recalled.
"But the biggest fairytale I remember was an emotional Phil Taylor winning the tournament in his final year as a pro. There'll be plenty more chapters written this year, I'm sure of that."
The PDC has pumped yet more money into the World Matchplay - the player who leaves with the Phil Taylor Trophy also pockets £150,000. This, combined with the depth of talent on show, makes Porter's prediction of memorable chapters written a certainty.
ADVERTISEMENT
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







