Rock rises to the occasion with superb deciding set win over Aspinall with 13 180's, books Last 16 spot at PDC World Darts Championship
PDC
Josh Rock came into the 2022/23 PDC World Darts Championship on debut with high hopes being one of the favourites despite only playing a few TV tournaments and winning a sole ProTour but has risen to the occasion at the Alexandra Palace dumping out Nathan Aspinall in a superb 4-3 sets win.
ADVERTISEMENT
Rock hit 13 180's, a 95.92 average and 42% on the doubles which could have been even better missing key doubles to potentially ease through against Aspinall who was tenacious and full of fight as ever but heads home after a superb return this year.
This after injury hell plagued 'The Asp' twelve months ago and he wasn't sure if he would even play again but he goes out to the rising star.
A 180 and 85 checkout saw Rock hold to begin the tie. He hit a second on the throw but could only pressure as Aspinall held. Another 180 and double 20 saw Rock hold to go one away from the opening set.
Rock held in the decider though to seal the opening set with a superb 141 checkout. Aspinall missed 47 for an opening hold but Rock couldn’t break and ‘The Asp’ survived.
The set suddenly changed with Aspinall breaking with a 41 checkout to go 2-0 up and was throwing for 1-1. Both started with 180’s and Rock hit a second. Aspinall missed set darts and Rock broke to make it 2-1.
Aspinall missed another four set darts but Rock missed a dart at double 20 to hold and ‘The Asp’ after composing himself from the crowd pinned it to make it 1-1 in sets.
ADVERTISEMENT
A timely 180 left 56 which he pinned to go one away from a 2-1 sets lead. Rock missed 146 for 2-1 down but multiple set darts were missed by Aspinall and Rock held on double eight. But finally Aspinall hit double eight for a 2-1 lead.
Aspinall missed 130 to hold to begin the next set and Rock hit double eighteen for 1-0. He missed 109 slipping into double five but Aspinall missed a dart to break and Rock sealed the hold to go one away from 2-2.
Aspinall held on double 16 but after back-to-back 180’s, Rock hit double 20 for 2-2. He held on double 20 last dart to lead in the fifth set.
He missed 111 for 2-0 and Aspinall split 38 for double eight at 1-1. A 70 checkout on double eight saw Rock go one away from a 3-2 sets lead.
Two 180’s and double four saw Aspinall force a decider. A 12th 180 was hit by Rock but he missed set darts. Aspinall returned for 140 but missed double 10 and Rock returned for a last dart double five.
ADVERTISEMENT
Rock missed 160 for 1-1 and Aspinall hit double nine to go one away from forcing a decider. A 13th 180 for Rock and 12th from Aspinall saw Rock needing 124 but he missed double 11 and Aspinall hit double 16 for 3-3.
Rock missed double 20 for an opening hold but survived pressure from Aspinall to lead. A 99 checkout using two double 20’s saw Rock go one away.
A 177 saw Aspinall leave double 12 and he pinned double six to break back. He missed three darts for 2-2 and the tiebreak. A 70 checkout saw Rock seal it.
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026
- I agree,I can't believe the lack of coverage of this sad loss. Always enjoyed watching him,but I guess now it's all about littler,well it seems that way. Darts has sadly lost a good manrick6717-10-2026
- In the absence of a report regarding the death of Stefan Lord, I'll assist. An excellent player in the late 70s and early 80s, he actually won the now defunct 3rd place match at two World Championships and a couple of the News of the World Championships. A fabulous player and easily the best Swedish player ever. Rest peacefully Stefan.richieburnettrocks16-10-2026
- Joking aside, it is the second most watched sport on sky (more than golf, F1 etc) behind football only, and in participation is second to only football and swimming. It doesn't get the attention or sponsorship of "bigger" sports because it's not as sexy, but it's right up there.BandB13-10-2026