"You can’t make a couple of major finals and suddenly it’s three people": Luke Humphries brushes off talk of darts Big Three including Van Veen
PDC
Luke Humphries began his 2026 season with a commanding performance at the Bahrain Darts Masters, producing another emphatic whitewash victory over Abdulla Saeed to underline both his form and focus heading into a demanding start to the year.
ADVERTISEMENT
The world number one looked sharp from the outset, brushing aside the Bahraini representative with a level of control and scoring power that immediately stood out in a field still shaking off the rust of the post-World Championship break.
“Yeah, it was a decent performance,” Humphries said afterwards. “I think Abdulla played a lot better than he has done the last two years against me. He actually played some good legs, and I feel like tonight I played even better than I have done myself against him before. So yeah, I’m quite happy with my performance.”
While several players have admitted to struggling in their first competitive outing since Ally Pally, Humphries felt his preparation had made the difference. Unlike previous seasons, he avoided a lengthy break from the practice board.
“The difference for me this year is that I usually have a seven-to-ten-day break where I don’t throw any darts, and then I come into the Bahrain Masters without much practice,” he explained. “This year I didn’t do that. I maybe had three days off and then I was straight back on the practice board.
“I didn’t want to come here rusty. I wanted to start the season a bit better than I usually do. I don’t think I played too badly at the Worlds – I was scoring really well – so I’ve just tried to keep on the ball a little bit more this year.”
Despite the convincing nature of the win, Humphries admitted there was a hint of disappointment when the draw paired him once again with Saeed, the same opponent he has repeatedly faced in Bahrain.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Of course, I was a little bit disappointed because you want to play someone different,” he said. “I’ve spent a bit of time with Abdulla when I’ve been in Bahrain and he’s a really nice bloke. I think he wants to play someone different as well – maybe Luke Littler or Michael van Gerwen – just for that experience.
“I feel bad beating him six-nil every time, but it’s business up there. I’m here to showcase my talent. You don’t want to play the same person every time, but the draw is the draw.”
Big Three notion rubbished
Humphries also addressed the wider conversation around the men’s game, particularly following Gian van Veen’s recent rise and suggestions that a new rivalry is forming at the top.
“I still think it is about the two of us,” he said, referring to himself and Luke Littler. “For someone else to come into that mix, you’ve got a lot to prove. You can’t make a couple of major finals and suddenly it’s three people.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Over the last two, two-and-a-half years, I’ve made around 50 major finals and I think Luke’s made about 50 as well. Someone else has got to do that before you say they’re in that mix. That said, Gian has definitely shown a level where he can challenge us and be part of that elite.”
Off the board, Humphries revealed that fans could soon see noticeable changes to his setup, with new equipment and a conscious effort to move away from long-held superstitions.
“Very close – very, very close,” he said when asked about a potential dart change. “You’re going to see me throw something new very soon. We just weren’t ready for them to be here yet.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I’m very superstitious, but I’m trying to take that mould away. New shoes, new bag, new rucksack, new darts coming, new shirts – all things I’d normally never do. But I don’t think superstition really holds me back, so I’m trying new things now. You’ll see a new set very soon, as long as they’re right.”
That theme of evolution continued as Humphries reflected on what he described as a more relaxed version of himself heading into the new campaign.
“I’m always trying to be a better version of myself – as a player and as a person,” he said. “The last couple of years after winning the Worlds, I felt like I was trying to please everyone: the PDC, myself, my family.
“This year I just want to play, enjoy it, and see what happens. I’m still young and I feel like I’ve got a lot more to give.”
Balancing relentless schedule
ADVERTISEMENT
With Bahrain followed quickly by Saudi Arabia and the Premier League, Humphries believes his experience will be crucial in managing the relentless schedule – something he feels newer stars will soon learn.
“When you’re playing every World Series, every Premier League night, every European Tour, burnout does happen,” he said. “You come off the Worlds playing great and think you’ll just keep going, but it doesn’t work like that.
“Josh Rock and Gian van Veen will learn that you can’t do everything. Halfway through, you realise it’s tougher than people think. But they’re young, fit and healthy, and I think they’ll do really well.”
Alcohol not needed for a good time and Riyadh Season bullseye
Looking ahead to Saudi Arabia, Humphries dismissed concerns over atmosphere at events without alcohol, insisting respect and appreciation for the sport would take centre stage.
ADVERTISEMENT
“It doesn’t take alcohol to have a good night,” he said. “The Saudi people are very respectful and they’ll be excited to see the talent we produce. When you go to places like Saudi or Japan, the crowds appreciate the sport in a different way – they sit back and enjoy it.”
He also welcomed innovative ideas such as the £200,000 ten-dart challenge, where players must hit the bull after a nine-darter.
“It’s different, but I think it’s great,” he added. “It creates drama and excitement. The bull is the smallest target, so it should be hard. I think these little things are great for the sport.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 12visitors 4
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026