Again nobody could keep up with Michael van Gerwen in the Fantasy Darts 2018 from Zweeler. Partly thanks to the third world title, Mighty Mike finished at 726 points. Gary Anderson, the number 2, remained further back with a score of 401. Who will close the gap in 2019 with the best player in the world?
ADVERTISEMENT
A large group of players are eligible for this. If you know how to find the right darters and incorporate them in your ideal 15, you can win the first prize of at least! to register and to go to the game when you are already registered at Zweeler. The Fantasy Darts 2019 starts on at with The Masters. You have a budget of 200 million euro to buy 15 darts players of which you think are going to win the most points in the Fantasy Darts 2019. The World Darts Championship, all major tournaments and the European Tour events count for this game. You can win points with your team based upon the achievements of your darts players in all tournaments which count for this game. You can score points per round in the knockout tournaments and via the final classification of the Premier League. The game will cost per team and will start with a guaranteed amount of prizes of . The first prize will be (61 GC prizes).
Value darts players Fantasy 2019:
1 Gerwen, Michael van 60 mln.
2 Smith, Michael 33,7 mln.
3 Anderson, Gary 28,9 mln.
4 Wade, James 28,6 mln.
5 Wright, Peter 28,5 mln.
6 Price, Gerwyn 27,1 mln.
7 Cross, Rob 26,8 mln.
8 Gurney, Daryl 25,6 mln.
9 Suljovic, Mensur 23,2 mln.
10 Whitlock, Simon 19 mln.
11 Chisnall, Dave 16,9 mln.
12 Lewis, Adrian 15,7 mln.
13 Cullen, Joe 15,3 mln.
14 White, Ian 13,5 mln.
15 Clayton, Jonny 12,2 mln.
16 Barneveld, Raymond van 12,1 mln.
17 Hopp, Max 11,9 mln.
18 Webster, Darren 10,8 mln.
19 Noppert, Danny 10,7 mln.
20 Dobey, Chris 10,4 mln.
21 Bergh, Dimitri Van den 10 mln.
22 Zwaan, Jeffrey de 9,9 mln.
23 West, Steve 9,7 mln.
24 Bunting, Stephen 9,6 mln.
25 Huybrechts, Kim 9,5 mln.
26 Humphries, Luke 9,1 mln.
27 Cadby, Corey 8,9 mln.
28 Klaasen, Jelle 8,8 mln.
29 Aspinall, Nathan 8,7 mln.
30 Ratajski, Krzysztof 8,4 mln.
31 Anderson, Kyle 8,1 mln.
32 Lennon, Steve 7,5 mln.
33 Lewis, Jamie 7,2 mln.
34 Durrant, Glen 7,1 mln.
35 King, Mervyn 7 mln.
36 Wattimena, Jermaine 6,9 mln.
37 Norris, Alan 6,6 mln.
38 Henderson, John 6,5 mln.
39 Joyce, Ryan 6,4 mln.
40 North, Richard 6,3 mln.
41 Wilson, James 6,1 mln.
42 Reyes, Cristo 6 mln.
43 Pas, Benito van de 5,9 mln.
44 Beaton, Steve 5,8 mln.
45 Searle, Ryan 5,6 mln.
46 Evans, Ricky 5,5 mln.
47 Schindler, Martin 5,4 mln.
48 Brown, Keegan 5,3 mln.
49 Dolan, Brendan 5,1 mln.
50 Voort, Vincent van der 5 mln.
51 Clemens, Gabriel 4,7 mln.
52 Labanauskas, Darius 4,6 mln.
53 Petersen, Devon 4,5 mln.
54 Thornton, Robert 4,4 mln.
55 Dekker, Jan 4,3 mln.
56 Meulenkamp, Ron 4,1 mln.
57 Payne, Josh 4 mln.
58 O'Connor, William 3,9 mln.
59 Owen, Robert 3,7 mln.
60 McGeeney, Mark 3,6 mln.
61 Pipe, Justin 3,5 mln.
62 Alcinas, Toni 3,4 mln.
63 Kist, Christian 3,3 mln.
64 Webster, Mark 3,2 mln.
65 Pallett, Dave 3,1 mln.
66 Richardson, James 3,1 mln.
67 Evetts, Ted 3 mln.
68 Huybrechts, Ronny 3 mln.
69 Smith, Ross 2,9 mln.
70 Rodriguez, Rowby-John 2,8 mln.
71 Tabern, Alan 2,8 mln.
72 Nicholson, Paul 2,7 mln.
73 Zonneveld, Niels 2,7 mln.
74 Duivenbode, Mike van 2,6 mln.
75 Jenkins, Terry 2,6 mln.
76 Lerchbacher, Zoran 2,6 mln.
77 Edgar, Matthew 2,5 mln.
78 Mansell, Mickey 2,5 mln.
79 Meikle, Ryan 2,5 mln.
80 Razma, Madars 2,5 mln.
81 Barnard, Michael 2,4 mln.
82 Hunt, Adam 2,4 mln.
83 Bunse, Christian 2,3 mln.
84 Duijvenbode, Dirk van 2,3 mln.
85 Caven, Jamie 2,2 mln.
86 Jones, Wayne 2,2 mln.
87 Painter, Kevin 2,2 mln.
88 Rafferty, Nathan 2,2 mln.
89 Baker, Scott 2,1 mln.
90 Brooks, Bradley 2,1 mln.
91 Graaf, Jeffrey de 2,1 mln.
92 Part, John 2,1 mln.
93 Stevenson, Simon 2,1 mln.
94 Boulton, Andy 2 mln.
95 Burness, Kevin 2 mln.
96 Green, Robbie 2 mln.
97 Jacques, Peter 2 mln.
98 Marijanovic, Robert 2 mln.
99 Meeuwisse, Yordi 2 mln.
100 Burton, Stephen 1,9 mln.
2 Smith, Michael 33,7 mln.
3 Anderson, Gary 28,9 mln.
4 Wade, James 28,6 mln.
5 Wright, Peter 28,5 mln.
6 Price, Gerwyn 27,1 mln.
7 Cross, Rob 26,8 mln.
8 Gurney, Daryl 25,6 mln.
9 Suljovic, Mensur 23,2 mln.
10 Whitlock, Simon 19 mln.
11 Chisnall, Dave 16,9 mln.
12 Lewis, Adrian 15,7 mln.
13 Cullen, Joe 15,3 mln.
14 White, Ian 13,5 mln.
15 Clayton, Jonny 12,2 mln.
16 Barneveld, Raymond van 12,1 mln.
17 Hopp, Max 11,9 mln.
18 Webster, Darren 10,8 mln.
19 Noppert, Danny 10,7 mln.
20 Dobey, Chris 10,4 mln.
21 Bergh, Dimitri Van den 10 mln.
22 Zwaan, Jeffrey de 9,9 mln.
23 West, Steve 9,7 mln.
24 Bunting, Stephen 9,6 mln.
25 Huybrechts, Kim 9,5 mln.
26 Humphries, Luke 9,1 mln.
27 Cadby, Corey 8,9 mln.
28 Klaasen, Jelle 8,8 mln.
29 Aspinall, Nathan 8,7 mln.
30 Ratajski, Krzysztof 8,4 mln.
31 Anderson, Kyle 8,1 mln.
32 Lennon, Steve 7,5 mln.
33 Lewis, Jamie 7,2 mln.
34 Durrant, Glen 7,1 mln.
35 King, Mervyn 7 mln.
36 Wattimena, Jermaine 6,9 mln.
37 Norris, Alan 6,6 mln.
38 Henderson, John 6,5 mln.
39 Joyce, Ryan 6,4 mln.
40 North, Richard 6,3 mln.
41 Wilson, James 6,1 mln.
42 Reyes, Cristo 6 mln.
43 Pas, Benito van de 5,9 mln.
44 Beaton, Steve 5,8 mln.
45 Searle, Ryan 5,6 mln.
46 Evans, Ricky 5,5 mln.
47 Schindler, Martin 5,4 mln.
48 Brown, Keegan 5,3 mln.
49 Dolan, Brendan 5,1 mln.
50 Voort, Vincent van der 5 mln.
51 Clemens, Gabriel 4,7 mln.
52 Labanauskas, Darius 4,6 mln.
53 Petersen, Devon 4,5 mln.
54 Thornton, Robert 4,4 mln.
55 Dekker, Jan 4,3 mln.
56 Meulenkamp, Ron 4,1 mln.
57 Payne, Josh 4 mln.
58 O'Connor, William 3,9 mln.
59 Owen, Robert 3,7 mln.
60 McGeeney, Mark 3,6 mln.
61 Pipe, Justin 3,5 mln.
62 Alcinas, Toni 3,4 mln.
63 Kist, Christian 3,3 mln.
64 Webster, Mark 3,2 mln.
65 Pallett, Dave 3,1 mln.
66 Richardson, James 3,1 mln.
67 Evetts, Ted 3 mln.
68 Huybrechts, Ronny 3 mln.
69 Smith, Ross 2,9 mln.
70 Rodriguez, Rowby-John 2,8 mln.
71 Tabern, Alan 2,8 mln.
72 Nicholson, Paul 2,7 mln.
73 Zonneveld, Niels 2,7 mln.
74 Duivenbode, Mike van 2,6 mln.
75 Jenkins, Terry 2,6 mln.
76 Lerchbacher, Zoran 2,6 mln.
77 Edgar, Matthew 2,5 mln.
78 Mansell, Mickey 2,5 mln.
79 Meikle, Ryan 2,5 mln.
80 Razma, Madars 2,5 mln.
81 Barnard, Michael 2,4 mln.
82 Hunt, Adam 2,4 mln.
83 Bunse, Christian 2,3 mln.
84 Duijvenbode, Dirk van 2,3 mln.
85 Caven, Jamie 2,2 mln.
86 Jones, Wayne 2,2 mln.
87 Painter, Kevin 2,2 mln.
88 Rafferty, Nathan 2,2 mln.
89 Baker, Scott 2,1 mln.
90 Brooks, Bradley 2,1 mln.
91 Graaf, Jeffrey de 2,1 mln.
92 Part, John 2,1 mln.
93 Stevenson, Simon 2,1 mln.
94 Boulton, Andy 2 mln.
95 Burness, Kevin 2 mln.
96 Green, Robbie 2 mln.
97 Jacques, Peter 2 mln.
98 Marijanovic, Robert 2 mln.
99 Meeuwisse, Yordi 2 mln.
100 Burton, Stephen 1,9 mln.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026