
He reached the final in 2015, 2016 and 2017. Now Gary Anderson has set his sights on a fourth consecutive Ally Pally showdown after kicking off the 2018 World Championship with a 3-0 win over Jeff Smith. The Flying Scotsman fired in a staggering seven 180s in just 11 legs as he set up a second round meeting with Mark Webster or Kai Fan Leung.
Anderson almost started perfectly with Shanghai to break, but drifted into the double one. Double 19 was no problem, however, and a maximum immediately followed at the beginning of the second leg. Smith, not a particularly powerful scorer, could not lay a glove on Anderson in the opening stages. Busting nine by pulling into the single 18 went unpunished, allowing the Scot to hold. Smith was unable to punish Anderson's slacker darts, meaning the first set was won without a hitch.
The second set started with a bang. Two 180s was followed by a single 20, a chorus of boos, and two more perfectly placed dart to set up double eight and the first ten-dart leg of the championships. Smith averaged 95 against Luke Humphries, but struggled to lift his average above 70 in the opening stages. His finishing was his magnum opus in the prelims, but he wasn't getting much of a chance to prove it. When tasked with 36 in the second leg of the second set, however, the Canadian finally got his first leg on the board. Had Anderson converted bull for a 170 checkout, the Silencer may have been silenced for good. That said, a 180 and a 177 in the third leg of the set did that. The 11-darter was followed by four more perfect darts to start the following leg. Tops meant a 12-darter and a two set lead for Anderson, whose average had ballooned from 83 to 105.
A 132 average across the second set is a hard act to follow. It was Smith who laid down an early challenge, opening with a 171, but consistent scoring was proving to be a real struggle. But Anderson missed three darts at a finish, allowing Smith a chance at double 16. His three darts were wayward, but yet more Anderson misses meant Smith could claim just his second leg of the match. The seventh 180 saw Anderson through to an easy win in the second leg of the set, and 134 set up tops and a break of throw. A maximum-deficient Smith could only watch on helplessly as Anderson piled on the points. A 177 left 42 and, after Smith passed up the chance of a 96 checkout, Anderson had the chance to finish the job. Four missed match darts later, the job was done.

Anderson almost started perfectly with Shanghai to break, but drifted into the double one. Double 19 was no problem, however, and a maximum immediately followed at the beginning of the second leg. Smith, not a particularly powerful scorer, could not lay a glove on Anderson in the opening stages. Busting nine by pulling into the single 18 went unpunished, allowing the Scot to hold. Smith was unable to punish Anderson's slacker darts, meaning the first set was won without a hitch.
The second set started with a bang. Two 180s was followed by a single 20, a chorus of boos, and two more perfectly placed dart to set up double eight and the first ten-dart leg of the championships. Smith averaged 95 against Luke Humphries, but struggled to lift his average above 70 in the opening stages. His finishing was his magnum opus in the prelims, but he wasn't getting much of a chance to prove it. When tasked with 36 in the second leg of the second set, however, the Canadian finally got his first leg on the board. Had Anderson converted bull for a 170 checkout, the Silencer may have been silenced for good. That said, a 180 and a 177 in the third leg of the set did that. The 11-darter was followed by four more perfect darts to start the following leg. Tops meant a 12-darter and a two set lead for Anderson, whose average had ballooned from 83 to 105.
A 132 average across the second set is a hard act to follow. It was Smith who laid down an early challenge, opening with a 171, but consistent scoring was proving to be a real struggle. But Anderson missed three darts at a finish, allowing Smith a chance at double 16. His three darts were wayward, but yet more Anderson misses meant Smith could claim just his second leg of the match. The seventh 180 saw Anderson through to an easy win in the second leg of the set, and 134 set up tops and a break of throw. A maximum-deficient Smith could only watch on helplessly as Anderson piled on the points. A 177 left 42 and, after Smith passed up the chance of a 96 checkout, Anderson had the chance to finish the job. Four missed match darts later, the job was done.

ADVERTISEMENT
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026







