The first title winners on the final day of action at the Dutch Open have been confirmed with Berry van Peer/Gino Vos and Mikuru Suzuki/Yuriko Yamaguchi claiming the pairs titles.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Peer and Vos edged out Justin van Tergouw and Martijn Kleermaker in a last leg decider. Berry has been noted this weekend as still suffering with dartitis so this will be a big win.
Suzuki once again added to her title haul after winning Lakeside last month. They defeated Lorraine Winstanley and Corrine Hammond 4-0.
’Miracle’ will aim for a double as she faces Aileen de Graaf in the final later.
Men’s
Quarter-Final
Kleermaker/Van Tergouw 3-1 Mevissen/Philippi
Martin/Warburton 3-2 Van der Wal/Van Malsen
Vos/Van Peer 3-0 Sparidaans/Merkx
Telnekes/Schenk 3-0 Warren/Kenny
Semi-Final
Kleermaker/Van Tergouw 4-3 Martin/Warburton
Vos/Van Peer 4-1 Telnekes/Schenk
Final
Kleermaker/Van Tergouw 4-5 Vos/Van Peer
Ladies
Quarter-Final
Kanovska/Konings 3-1 Verhaegen/Smets
Winstanley/Hammond 3-0 Zijlstra/Herms
Jacklin/Gulliver 3-0 Ashton/O’Brien
Suzuki/Yamaguchi 3-1 Hedman/Clements
Semi-Final
Winstanley/Hammond 3-0 Kanovska/Konings
Suzuki/Yamaguchi 3-2 Jacklin/Gulliver
Final
Winstanley/Hammond 0-4 Suzuki/Yamaguchi
Suzuki once again added to her title haul after winning Lakeside last month. They defeated Lorraine Winstanley and Corrine Hammond 4-0.
’Miracle’ will aim for a double as she faces Aileen de Graaf in the final later.
Men’s
Quarter-Final
Kleermaker/Van Tergouw 3-1 Mevissen/Philippi
Martin/Warburton 3-2 Van der Wal/Van Malsen
Vos/Van Peer 3-0 Sparidaans/Merkx
Telnekes/Schenk 3-0 Warren/Kenny
Semi-Final
Kleermaker/Van Tergouw 4-3 Martin/Warburton
Vos/Van Peer 4-1 Telnekes/Schenk
Final
Kleermaker/Van Tergouw 4-5 Vos/Van Peer
Ladies
Quarter-Final
Kanovska/Konings 3-1 Verhaegen/Smets
Winstanley/Hammond 3-0 Zijlstra/Herms
Jacklin/Gulliver 3-0 Ashton/O’Brien
Suzuki/Yamaguchi 3-1 Hedman/Clements
Semi-Final
Winstanley/Hammond 3-0 Kanovska/Konings
Suzuki/Yamaguchi 3-2 Jacklin/Gulliver
Final
Winstanley/Hammond 0-4 Suzuki/Yamaguchi
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Joking aside, it is the second most watched sport on sky (more than golf, F1 etc) behind football only, and in participation is second to only football and swimming. It doesn't get the attention or sponsorship of "bigger" sports because it's not as sexy, but it's right up there.BandB13-10-2026
- i love darts but you can't seriously believe it's the second most popular sport in the uk. even top five is pushing it. it may be the fastest growing, though.colt13-10-2026
- I'm a big Clayton fan, but he's got this completely wrong. Qualification criteria exists for a reason - so just as failing to make the top 32/64 for the Euro championships/PT Finals means you miss out, so does not lifting a title for this one.26sForFun12-10-2026
- The players who deliberately slow the game down are usually boring and win very little in the way of silverware. Horrible to watch.MrYnyslas197112-10-2026
- [“The Gentle” then used a sweeping and questionable phrase...] You anglocucks are hilariously finished in every sense of the word.Critical99911-10-2026
- I love Jonny but I disagree. The Grand Slam was always supposed to be "champion of champions" type competition. If the top 16 are guaranteed participation in everything there will be so much less jeopardy involved in qualifying and each major tournament will lose its unique flavour which the PDC has worked hard trying to develop. I enjoy following the qualification races towards the end of the year, and while consistency should have its rewards, the truth is Jonny hasn't reached a major final all year or won a single event on the Pro Tour. Being consistent is one thing, but that alone should have consequences as the sport's elite should not be prepared to accept consistently strong performances, their foremost motivation should be to win and this should be what separates them from the rest, not the consistency of their performances. Jonny is expecting that losing should be enough; it shouldn't be, at least not as far as the Grand Slam is concerned.Deduce635811-10-2026
- Well being honest,it doesn't matter what level you play at, there's always someone who slows it down to suit themselves,and extra swig of water, replacing flights, asking the ref what the score is. It happens wherever. I'm not saying it's professional,but I'm sure we've all seen it beforerick6711-10-2026
- Agree completely. Not sure how a ranking event can have a criteria not based on rankings. And he right on popularity. In the UK second only to football.BandB11-10-2026
- Doesn't matter who's in it,it's boringrick6710-10-2026
- Assuming you qualify as one of the "muppets" in question. Classist too. And since you're so clearly interested in academia, look up "linguistic descriptivism" while you're at it. Oh, and better stay away from the working class sport of darts and maybe offer your insightful analysis to, let's say, croquet instead?Deduce635806-10-2026
Loading