"I'm still averaging probably higher than all of them put together" - Gary Anderson heads to Ally Pally determined to make his mark against new generation
PDCGary Anderson begins his quest for a third world title in a few weeks against either Jeffrey de Graaf or Rashad Sweeting. After a quieter few years, the 53-year-old Scot comes to this PDC World Darts Championship high on confidence and in top form.
ADVERTISEMENT
Although perhaps more of a dark horse than an outright favourite to lift the Sid Waddell Trophy on January 3rd, Anderson has been the top performing player on the Pro Tour in 2024 average wise, rising back up the Order of Merit as a result and arriving at the Alexandra Palace this year as 14th seed.
Read also
"Yeah, it's getting better. But at the same stage, what I try to tell people is the old guys are still playing well," Anderson says confidently in conversation with Sky Sports, determined to prove himself against the current crop of darting stars such as Luke Littler and Luke Humphries. "I'm still averaging probably higher than all of them put together. So, yes, they've got youth on their side, which to us boys is a bit downgrading because we want to be young again, but they've got a great future in front of them. Darts is going to be very good in the next four to five, six years."
"It is great for youngsters, they come straight out of school, they're making so much money, fantastic, absolutely fantastic. But if anything goes wrong, they've never got a trade to go to," he continues, reflecting on the differences between nowadays and when he was starting out on his darts career. "If something happened, they couldn't throw darts, they've got dartitis, can't play darts ever again, what are they going to do? They've left school, they've done darts for four or five years, they're now stuck, there's not a lot out there. I've always said, get a trade, have something behind you that you can fall onto. It's there for a safety net."
With two titles already under his belt, a third would put Anderson clear as the most successful Scot in World Darts Championship history. "Well, it's winning it twice, you know, but I've been in five finals," Anderson is quick to note. "Out of the two, it would have to be playing Phil. You know Phil, the legend that he is, and the amount of times he's won championships on that stage. You've got youngsters there now that will never have the chance to play Phil Taylor. So even if Phil had beat me, it wouldn't have bothered me. I was playing Phil Taylor in the final."
"I think when you win it, the pressure's off," the Scotsman adds. "It doesn't matter what happens after that, your name's always going to be on that trophy. When I won it the second time, the third time, I did go for the hat-trick. There have been boys that have won it back-to-back. I don't think they've done it three times in a row. But I made the finals - so I've done five finals, won it twice, so I've done not too bad there."
As for this year though, as mentioned Anderson comes in more as a dark horse than one of the outright favourites and as such, the pressure is eased slightly. "You want to play well in every tournament. For sure," he previews. "But we're getting to the end of it. You know, the World Championship at the end of the year, so we've just come to the end of the Pro Tour, end of the European, Grand Slam, Players' Championship, on to the Worlds. So that should give the boys time to get ready for the big one. I can play well one day and absolutely terrible the next day. So I don't expect nothing now. I've got no expectations. I just want to go up there and play well."
ADVERTISEMENT
And his experience could be key. "It's probably the first big stage, especially for the newcomers. And the first time they're up there, that's one of the biggest stages that any darts player will play. Well, it is the biggest stage," he concludes. "Just the sheer length of the stage and the crowd behind it. So, the first time, it is a bit off-putting and a different atmosphere."
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026







