"It was a great gesture from the world number one" - Gian van Veen recalls Luke Humphries class after recent Players Championship final
PDCGian van Veen has had an incredible week. On Tuesday, he reached the final of the fifth Players Championship event of the year, narrowly losing 8-7 to Joe Cullen. However, just a day later, he made up for it in Players Championship 6, defeating former world champion Luke Humphries 8-3 in the final.
ADVERTISEMENT
Before his match against Humphries, Van Veen had a brief chat with his opponent. “He told me beforehand that he knew how tough it was to play at this level over two days because he had experienced it himself,” Van Veen told De Telegraaf. “He said, ‘You really deserve to win one.’ So I jokingly asked him if he was going to let me win, but of course, that wasn’t going to happen. After the match, his reaction was truly genuine. He was really happy for me, even though it must have stung a little for him. It was a great gesture from the world number one.”
Read also
Van Veen has been in excellent form for some time. “Everyone kept saying, ‘It’s time you won a title,’ but that’s easier said than done. It just meant I had two steady years without any major breakthroughs. Then, when you miss six match darts, people start saying, ‘You had another great tournament, but you just can’t get over the line.’ So it felt great to get it done just 24 hours later.”
The 22-year-old from Poederoijen has been consistently producing high averages in recent months, but he has often run into opponents playing the match of their lives against him. “That will probably be the case even more after this past week,” he said. “People often ask how I can lose so much while throwing such high averages. Just last weekend at the Belgian Darts Open, I lost with a 105 average—against Gerwyn Price, who posted an incredible 112.4. It happened a bit too often that I played brilliantly but still lost. So it means a lot that I’ve now managed to get over the line.”

Gian van Veen in action
Winning his first ranking final against none other than Humphries, the current world number one, must have been especially satisfying for Van Veen. “A thousand percent! It doesn’t get much tougher than playing Humphries. Before this, I had lost three finals—twice to Price and once to Van Gerwen. Against Cullen, I thought I had a real chance to win, with all due respect. This time, I was 7-3 up, but against Cullen, I was 7-4 ahead and still lost... At that moment, you can’t help but think, ‘Surely not again?’ Humphries can reel off five legs in a row with a few 12- or 13-darters—he’s just that good. So it felt even better when my first match dart went straight in. The entire world’s top players were competing this week, and in two days, I beat the top three in the world.” Laughing, he added, “That doesn’t happen every day! There’s almost no better way to confirm my progress.”
Now, the question is whether this is just the beginning for Van Veen. “We’ll have to wait and see, but it’s clear that things are going brilliantly this year. I’m really looking forward to what’s ahead. But I’m not suddenly going to start acting differently on stage, don’t worry!”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
GLORY FOR GIAN IN PC6! 🏆
— PDC Darts (@OfficialPDC) March 12, 2025
After suffering heartbreak in yesterday's final against Joe Cullen, Gian van Veen wins his first Players Championship title - defeating Luke Humphries 8-3!
📺 https://t.co/YyBPPwoMK8#PC6 pic.twitter.com/TqJVtHWs0u

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026
- I agree,I can't believe the lack of coverage of this sad loss. Always enjoyed watching him,but I guess now it's all about littler,well it seems that way. Darts has sadly lost a good manrick6717-10-2026
- In the absence of a report regarding the death of Stefan Lord, I'll assist. An excellent player in the late 70s and early 80s, he actually won the now defunct 3rd place match at two World Championships and a couple of the News of the World Championships. A fabulous player and easily the best Swedish player ever. Rest peacefully Stefan.richieburnettrocks16-10-2026






