
As the sporting world grinds to a halt, Barry Hearn and co have announced an ingenious way to keep the sport going during the current lockdown.
ADVERTISEMENT
Today will see the launch of the first ever ‘PDC Home Tour’ following a successful trial period through the Darts At Home series. Nine players competed, across two nights of action, in a mini league which was screened through YouTube and Facebook.
One of the stars to compete in the new format was world number 17 Stephen Bunting. He gave DartsNews his thoughts on the new format ‘I loved it. I think it’s great we can still play darts at home and people will still tune in. It gives the fans something to watch and keeps us playing, which helps when we get back to the tour.’
The lock-down is taking its toll on all of us and darts players aren’t exempt, as Bunting admitted. ‘It’s very tough, I’m lucky to have a caring family around me. Filling my time with PlayStation and general housework.’
It’ll be very different. There won’t be a big stage, nor will there be a big crowd and while the usual razzmatazz will be absent it doesn’t mean we’ll be low on quality. One of the standout games of the trial was a Barney versus Taylor rematch, the Dutchman edged the contest while agonizingly missing double 12 for a perfect nine dart finish. Darts’ individuality lends itself to home playing, it works well for the fans and works well for the players.
Any darts player will tell you that preparation is key. Bunting will prepare for this like any other event. I’ll still be putting several hours in on the board to be ready. It’s another great opportunity by the PDC to show how good we can be.’
Different environnement
ADVERTISEMENT
We always associate a live PDC tournament with a boisterous crowd but instead the players will be at home. No noise, except their own, something none of us will be used to, especially the players. ‘It does take adjusting’ said Bunting ‘Getting used to a player’s pace but not having them in front of you is difficult. Waiting for the relay of the scores, it’s more relaxed. Saying that when I played, I wanted to win which made me more nervous!’
Notable absentees being World Number One Michael van Gerwen, who is unable to meet the requirements for the tournament and former world champion Gary Anderson, who claims his WiFi isn’t up to acceptable standard, as bizarre as it seems, you can imagine Russ Bray and his gravelly voice outside the Anderson household ‘Gary you require…A better WiFi connection!’
Four players will play each night. The format will see competitors play each other once in matches played over the best of nine legs, with a winner crowned each night. At the conclusion of the initial 32 nights of league action, the group winners will advance through into phase two of the competition.
It’s a sporting fix for the fans and keeps the players playing competitively but Bunting doesn’t see the format bring a long term fix. A big part of our sport is the fans but it’s a good tournament and one we could possibly fit it into the calendar every year. My family don’t go to many tour events, so it’s nice for them to be able to see me competing on live streams.’
One of the big differences from this, to a regular tournament, was players keeping their own score, you take your throw and with some quick maths the players themselves shout out their score. The Bullet doesn’t believe players use this for their own gain. ‘They are all professionals and if they cheat they’d only be cheating themselves', he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Live sport is a premium, especially during these tough times, luckily the PDC have given us a lifeline, for the next couple of months. At least – as long as we aren’t all on the same provider as Gary Anderson, that is.
Schedule PDC Home Tour
Friday April 17 (19:30 - 22:30 GMT)
Group One
19:30 Peter Wright v Peter Jacques
19:55 Jamie Lewis v Niels Zonneveld
20:20 Peter Jacques v Niels Zonneveld
20:45 Peter Wright v Jamie Lewis
21:10 Jamie Lewis v Peter Jacques
21:35 Niels Zonneveld v Peter Wright
19:55 Jamie Lewis v Niels Zonneveld
20:20 Peter Jacques v Niels Zonneveld
20:45 Peter Wright v Jamie Lewis
21:10 Jamie Lewis v Peter Jacques
21:35 Niels Zonneveld v Peter Wright
https://twitter.com/OfficialPDC/status/1251059627292340224
ADVERTISEMENT
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026






