
The second round of the PDC World Championship is in full swing now, after another packed night of drama on the evening of day nine. Mensur Suljovic was staggeringly sub-par, yet still overcame Rob Thornton. Paul Lim almost made history - again. And Michael van Gerwen whitewashed James Wilson, allowing Lethal Biscuit (who averaged close to 97) just four darts at a finish. Day 10 promises to extend the fun, starting with an intriguing afternoon session. Of the six seeds expected to take part this afternoon, only two made it - and they both face off in the middle match. Either side of that, the unseeded players who caused early shocks look to continue their fine form.
ADVERTISEMENT
Keegan Brown vs Zoran Lerchbacher
So, first up, we have James Wade vs Mervyn King. No, wait. It's Keegan Brown vs Zoran Lerchbacher, a meeting between two players who caused a real surprise in the first round. The prize is a last 16 place and a potential meeting with Phil Taylor, so the stakes are as high as they ever have been for this pair. Brown has now taken two major scalps in his time at the Ally Pally; John Part fell three years ago, and now Wade. Though the Machine was evidently faulty, Brown showed a lot of bottle to hold on for the 3-2 win, and threw a solid 95 average. The 2014 World Youth champion lost to Adrian Lewis in the second round after beating Part, but faces an easier tie this time around.
Yet Zoran Lerchbacher is no pushover, as King discovered. Whether or not the Austrian would have won had King not suffered an injury on stage is up for debate. What is known is that he ignored both that and the enforced delay caused by a broken light bulb, and averaged 92. Lerchbacher won a set at the World Championship for the first time on the way to beating King, so this is new ground for him. Neither has any sort of exceptional quality that makes them a clear favourite, but both can be excellent on their day. That means this is completely up for grabs. The second round tie with the lowest billing could be the most exciting of the lot.
Yet Zoran Lerchbacher is no pushover, as King discovered. Whether or not the Austrian would have won had King not suffered an injury on stage is up for debate. What is known is that he ignored both that and the enforced delay caused by a broken light bulb, and averaged 92. Lerchbacher won a set at the World Championship for the first time on the way to beating King, so this is new ground for him. Neither has any sort of exceptional quality that makes them a clear favourite, but both can be excellent on their day. That means this is completely up for grabs. The second round tie with the lowest billing could be the most exciting of the lot.
Michael Smith vs Rob Cross
What a treat this is for a second round match. After 2014 World Youth champion Brown leaves the stage, 2013 victor Michael Smith seeks to reach the last 16 for the fifth year in a row. Smith found it tough against Steve Lennon, especially when his usually solid scoring abandoned him, but had the quality to rattle off the three legs needed in the final set. At his best he's a joy to watch, with one of the smoothest, most relaxed actions in the game. Otherwise, Bully Boy is erratic, inconsistent and a real worry on the doubles. He cannot afford to be the latter against Rob Cross.
How much further can Cross' stock rise? He went from amateur to professional in no time. His rise from also-ran to perennial contender with earnings of over £150,000 was instant. In his first year in the PDC, he entered as 20th seed, and averaged 104.12. No matter whether it is against Seigo Asada or Phil Taylor, such an average on debut is nothing short of phenomenal. It is often easier to average higher against better players, in fact. If Cross feels he need to step up to take on Smith, he'll provide something that the 13th seed could not possibly deal with. The winner of this tie takes on Daryl Gurney or John Henderson - just as you thought ties early on in the World Championship can't be this good...
How much further can Cross' stock rise? He went from amateur to professional in no time. His rise from also-ran to perennial contender with earnings of over £150,000 was instant. In his first year in the PDC, he entered as 20th seed, and averaged 104.12. No matter whether it is against Seigo Asada or Phil Taylor, such an average on debut is nothing short of phenomenal. It is often easier to average higher against better players, in fact. If Cross feels he need to step up to take on Smith, he'll provide something that the 13th seed could not possibly deal with. The winner of this tie takes on Daryl Gurney or John Henderson - just as you thought ties early on in the World Championship can't be this good...
Steve West vs Jermaine Wattimena
Another match-up between two unseeded players, though that status belies their obvious quality. Steve West and Jermaine Wattimena already know Gary Anderson lies in wait, and know what sort of challenge that will be. If they can build on their first round showings, perhaps they can rattle the twice world champion. But a tough second round challenge comes first. West was cool and collected in a 3-1 defeat of Benito van de Pas, even when a 124 checkout from the big Belgian brought back painful memories from last year. After six first round exits, West has finally reached the promised land of best-of-seven action. He won't want to stop here.
There's just the small matter of slowing down the jet-fuelled Jermaine Wattimena. The Dutchman rattled in a 96.83 average in his 3-2 win over Joe Cullen, with all five sets wrapped up in 29 minutes - about the time it takes Justin Pipe to finish a leg. Wattimena had a slice of luck, as Cullen missed four match darts, but the Machine Gun earned his second round spot. West knows that Wattimena relies on rhythm. He will be in no rush to throw or pick up his darts, and will make his opponent play at his pace. If that doesn't deter Wattimena, this could be another game that goes all the way.
There's just the small matter of slowing down the jet-fuelled Jermaine Wattimena. The Dutchman rattled in a 96.83 average in his 3-2 win over Joe Cullen, with all five sets wrapped up in 29 minutes - about the time it takes Justin Pipe to finish a leg. Wattimena had a slice of luck, as Cullen missed four match darts, but the Machine Gun earned his second round spot. West knows that Wattimena relies on rhythm. He will be in no rush to throw or pick up his darts, and will make his opponent play at his pace. If that doesn't deter Wattimena, this could be another game that goes all the way.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026





