INTERVIEW: Painter looks back on career after decision to retire from professional darts: "I’m proud of what I’ve achieved"
PDC
Kevin Painter announced his retirement from professional darts this past week after failing to gain his Tour Card at Q-School ending an illustrious career which has seen ‘The Artist’ become a major champion and multiple ranking winner.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Painter spoke to DartsNews.com after his retirement to discuss the reasoning for his decision in more depth.
With the 2011 Players Championship Finals champion admitting that the prospect of the Challenge Tour after Q-School didn’t excite him which is when he decided to call it a day.
“When I went to Q-School, I had every intention of getting a Tour Card and going on the ProTour but as things didn’t work out, I’ve been thinking about it for a bit anyway,” said Painter to DartsNews.com.
“I thought I’d give it one more go and if it didn’t work out, I’d probably call it a day.
"I’m not saying it became too difficult because of the standard of play and I’m not good enough, I think the ability is unquestionable, it just hasn’t worked out.
“I don’t like some of the venues and sitting about. I just don’t fancy doing all of that anymore and I thought well my next step would be go to do the Challenge Tour and that really is not for me.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I really didn’t like the Challenge Tour, I didn’t do it all but over the past two years, two tournaments in one day I just didn’t fancy it.”
“I don’t really need it now, I can just sit back and relax and just step away from it a bit.”
New Q-School format
A new format was set for Q-School this year and Painter believes that the four day knockout style shouldn’t be how the tournament should be run and that more onus should be placed on the Challenge Tour.
“I think in some ways Q-School could be done differently, I think just having to perform over four days in a knockout to decide what you do for the rest of the year.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I think that could be done better. It should be some sort of league table done on the Challenge Tour but that’s just my opinion,” he continued.
The likes of Paul Nicholson not only gave their tributes to the career of ‘The Artist’. But also in his case asked him to mull the decision over but it isn’t one he will be reversing.
“You see Barney packed up and you see that he missed it. When he packed up, he was still playing TV tournaments and all that. You do miss that.
"That’s all I’ve been trying to do, get back on the tour so I can get that buzz again of playing in TV events. I don’t miss the floor events whatsoever, I don’t enjoy them at all. It’s just playing on TV that gives you the buzz.
“I’ve been off that for two and a half years now. Of course I miss that, it’s the only bit I do miss. I won’t be going back.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Looking back with pride on career
But despite that, it is a career that he looks back on with pride as he recounts memories not only in the PDC. But also in the BDO and playing for his country.
“I’m proud of what I’ve achieved. I said before that I think I could have won a few more things but I’ve won a TV major, I think it would have been a bit of an injustice if I never got one.
"There will be a lot of players who don’t get one, I played in the Premier League, I’ve been in the World final.
"I’ve played for my country 25-30 times, I had a fantastic time with that. I’ve just enjoyed it.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Winning the aforementioned major title back in the days of the Players Championship Finals being played in Doncaster was one of Painter’s finest hours.
He believes that if Phil Taylor wasn’t as dominant at that time, it could have seen more majors won throughout his career.
“Everyone wants to win a TV major and it worked out well for me that weekend, I had other chances in different tournaments.
"If Phil Taylor wasn’t around, a lot of players would have won a lot more titles and I think that was the case with me.
ADVERTISEMENT
"It was nice to get over the line that day and have a TV major in your pocket.”
“Phil was winning most of the tournaments. It was a major shock if someone else other than Phil won a title.
"I think nowadays there is so many good players, they’re being shared around a bit so the standard is difficult. When Phil was on his game, he was just so difficult to beat.
World Championship Final defeat
One of his best known games though came back at the 2004 World Championship Final where he lost out in a sudden death leg against ‘The Power’.
ADVERTISEMENT
He said he always had the mindset that he could play like he did.
“The whole week was great, I played some good darts. I had some really good games and I wasn’t overawed with the prospect of playing Phil.
"A lot of players used to just roll over because they couldn’t handle Phil. I went on there thinking I have a good chance of winning.
"I think everyone had me down for a 7-1, 7-2 defeat and it was close. I don’t regret anything.”
Love of exhibitions and future playing ambitions
ADVERTISEMENT
Painter spoke about still playing in exhibitions now his career is over with the popular Artist likely to have a full calendar when the pandemic ends. So what is it about exhibitions?
“It’s just a really fun night. You’re meeting people you haven’t met before a lot of the time.
"It’s nice to talk to different people and see different faces. When you’re playing on the ProTour, you see the same people week after week. Exhibitions are just great fun.”
“Everyone wants to get out now. I’m just looking forward to opening the diary up and seeing there is an exhibition is booked in.”
Despite retiring from professional darts, the potential is there for Painter if it comes up for a tilt at the Riley’s UK Open Qualifiers when they do return next year.
“I’m still going to play darts. I still enjoy the game and I’m still going to do my exhibitions and go to other tournaments. I’m just not going to do the PDC stuff and Challenge Tour.”
“My mate runs tournaments. I’ll be playing in them. If I fancy a game if those Riley’s Qualifiers come around next year and I’m not doing anything, I’ll go and play in them.
"The expectation that I’ve put on myself, that weighs heavy on you. I don’t have that now.”
Practicing with Matthew Edgar
Painter’s long time practice partner has been Matthew Edgar who has become well known for Edgar TV and nothing will change in terms of their routine.
“He’s a crazy lad. When I first met him, he was really quiet and wouldn’t say boo to a goose but now he’s crackers.
"Matt’s a great lad and a good practice partner and he contacted me as soon as I announced I was packing it in and said thanks for everything and can we still practice
"I said of course, I’ll still be practicing when we are allowed out so nothing will change there.”
“He just needs to step it up another level now and get himself higher up the rankings.”
On his love of Ipswich Town
But away from the oche, Painter hasn’t had a lot to shout about for his beloved Ipswich Town who sit 12th in League One currently so the chance to see them more isn’t filling him with joy now he has retired.
“It’s been absolute dire. Things are just not good at all, every week you have hope that they will win and they don’t.
"There’s just a lot of things wrong with the football club at the moment. It’s pretty unpleasant being an Ipswich fan at the minute, I have to say.”
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 4visitors 4
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026