"I made sure that people would never forget me" - Bobby George explains why winning trophies wasn't all important to him and his issues with the modern game
PDCOne of the most iconic figures in darting history, Bobby George is often regarded as one of the best players to never win a world title. Whilst he reached the Lakeside final on two occasions, in 1980 and 1994, Eric Bristow and John Part just proved one match too far for the "King of Bling".
ADVERTISEMENT
It's for this reason, that despite everything George gave to the game of darts, such as the introduction of walk on music, as he came to the oche serenaded by the Queen classic 'We Are The Champions', his iconic rivalry with Eric Bristow that defined a generation, or even his post-retirement punditry work over the last couple of decades, the now 78-year-old has gone down in history somewhat under-appreciated and underrated. In a recent conversation with Online Darts, George touched on this very topic.
Read also
"It's probably because I didn't push myself for trophies," he answers when quizzed on his apparent under-appreciation. "I went for the money, I got a big contract and I was earning a lot of money. So I thought, why should I go to Denmark and earn 400 quid just to get my money back and a bunch of flowers?"
It's not the first time George can remember the topic being raised either. "I remember Eric (Bristow ed.) once said to me that's what he should have done. Shouldn't have went for the tournaments, should have went for the money," George recalls. "But, we're all different aren't we. I done very well when I first started, because I had to to get known. So I made sure that people would never forget me. That's why I wore all the glitter. People thought I was gay and they said I couldn't count because I went different ways. But now, today, all the players go them ways."
Despite never winning the World Championship or the World Masters, George is widely regarded as the master of the old News of the World format (best of three legs), winning the tournament in 1979 and 1986, including on one occasion, without losing a single leg in the entire event. "I won it twice, I got to the final five times, but it took 10 months to get there. You don't just walk in and plan your day, you've got to go through round after round after round to even get to the big stage," he recalls. "I averaged over 100 every time I went to the board in 79, with tiny trebles, from 8 foot. I must have been good."

George became a trailblazer with his iconic walk on
Despite now being aged 78, George isn't yet done with darts. He still appears on the exhibition circuit and is a regular in his punditry role on the World Seniors Darts Tour. "I've always just done what I wanted to do," he says. "I talked to everyone. A lot of players these days don't want to talk to the people. Mustn't go near the crowd, mustn't do this, mustn't do that... In my day, it was part of the game and you couldn't say no. It's just as easy to take a selfie as it is to say no. It only takes a second, and everyone is happy."
ADVERTISEMENT
Because of his love of the sport and all things darts, George still follows the modern game. "There's not one nasty one at the top. The top players are all nice and I get on with them. They ask me questions about what would I do and things like that. They treat me with respect," George explains. "But you can't teach them personality. Like Jonny Clayton, he's got a personality, but he can't show it on the tele. They all can't do it on the tele because it's so serious."
"I think the modern game is too long, in my opinion. They think the longer the game the better, but it just gets boring I think," George assesses of darts in 2024. "They play so many legs and so many sets, by the time they've finished they need to go and have a shave!"
There's no doubting who the biggest superstar of today's darts is though, the 17-year-old Luke Littler, who has already begun to transcend the sport. "If you get to the final of a World Championship playing that standard, you've got to be a good dart player. But the problem is, can he maintain it?" George questions carefully. "It looks good what they're doing but the travelling... there's no time. He's only young and it's just if they push him too much."
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 9visitors 4
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026






