MvG made a statistically defensible decision not to throw for the bull against Mensur. (All probabilities below are derived from observed data on each players' specific checkouts.)
Statistician defends remarkable choice from Van Gerwen in match against Suljovic
PDCFriday, 30 December 2022 at 15:05
Talk has mostly been about that one remarkable moment in the last leg of the fifth set after the World Darts Championship match between Michael van Gerwen and Mensur Suljovic (4-2).
Van Gerwen could have finished the game in the fifth set, but he decided to set up from 121 to leave double 16. A mistake as it turned out, as Suljovic threw a fantastic 161 finish to keep himself in the match and reduce the deficit to 3-2.
Van Gerwen's action received varying comments on social media. Many people understood the choice of 'Mighty Mike', but there was also criticism. For instance, Belgian analyst and former dart player Erik Clarys judged Van Gerwen's choice particularly harshly.
However, statistician Christopher Kempf reveals on Twitter that statistically Van Gerwen made the right choice. According to his calculations, the chance of Suljovic throwing out 161 was only 2.8 per cent. Moreover, the chance that Van Gerwen would actually hit the bullseye was 'only' 29.8 per cent.
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- When Littler has at least five ranking Majors he’s in the discussion, until then, forget it.Mysstree14-11-2024
- This is the difference between other players and Phil Taylor. Phil would be completely motivated even before his walk on and didn't need anything else to do so.richieburnettrocks14-11-2024
- Still impressive though. Also literally everyone cares about averages that's what makes darts fascinating.medinabello14-11-2024
- BS he won a Euro Tour during this down period something that not many players can say. Dobey, Noppy, DvD, Ross Smith to name just a few.medinabello14-11-2024
- Maybe the supposed top players are burnt out from the endless travelling and tournaments, I just don't think they have the dedication or outright desire to win. I think they are more interested in the money and being popular, just keeping their rankings steady. The only thing that mattered to Phil Taylor was winning, not winning a few games to top up the money pot and seeking the fans attention. Maybe there is too many tournaments now and the enthusiasm is gone. This year especially has seen so many different winners and unexpected draws and line ups.richieburnettrocks14-11-2024