
With much of the world battling the coronavirus pandemic there is plenty of time being spent in our homes to help stop the spread.
ADVERTISEMENT
This situation has seen social media become packed with various fun challenges and videos of individuals finding innovative ways to fill their time and as we’re sure you are finding too, there’s more than enough time to get a few arrows in. We thought that this would be a good time to take a look at some of the best darts games you can play while at home, whether you’re isolating along or with others.
So, without further ado here are five of the best darts games to get you through isolation and beyond.
Best darts games to play alone
Around the Board
The concept of Around the Board is simple and can be adapted to suit players of all skill levels -the player simply works their way around the board from 1 all the way to the bullseye.
In its most basic form, the player throws for each number in ascending order with doubles and trebles all counting as a single number. They would throw for each number until hitting it and then move on to the next number.
Once the player has hit all 20 regular numbers, they would then move onto the 25 and bullseye. Whether the outer and inner bullseye is classed as one or separate is totally up to the player.
ADVERTISEMENT
Players who want to focus their practice on a specific part of the game can do so easily by making their way around the board just hitting trebles or doubles, for example.
For advanced players who wish to take on a tough version of the game consider setting a target to reach without missing a target. If the target being thrown for is missed the player should reset to the first number.
Kill Bull
Kill Bull is a great game, albeit frustrating at times, that can improve your bullseye hitting under pressure and is another that can be easily adapted to suit the level of the player.
ADVERTISEMENT
Only the outer and inner bullseye are used for this game in which the player would set a target score beforehand that is a multiple of either 25 or 50.
A beginner should consider using a lower score while an intermediate would look to achieve somewhere around the 500 mark. Advanced players may wish to set a score of 1000 or perhaps even more.
The player then throws three darts at the bullseye and should they hit either the 25 or 50 that number is added to their total. To continue adding to the score the player must hit either the 25 or 50 at least once in each throw (three darts). If all three darts in a throw finish outside the 25 the players score resets to zero.
Best darts games to play with others
’01 scoring legs
ADVERTISEMENT
This format widely used in competitive matches, whether that be in a local pub league or on the big stage in PDC events. The great thing about this standard format is that it can just as easily be used in your own home.
This leg scoring format will work best with two players playing against each other, but it also works for pairs and bigger teams, although any more than two per side can get a little untidy.
Both players, or sides, begin with the same score ending in ’01’ and play down to zero. Generally, 301 and 501 are the most commonly used scores but a 101 can be great for beginners or for those looking to squeeze a quick leg in. Contrastingly if your players are big scores and you have the time to spend a few minutes longer at the oche you may choose to play from 1001.
The easiest way to establish who should throw first is by playing ‘nearest the bull’. Both players (or one from each side) should throw one dart at the bullseye and the closest to that target wins and throws first in the leg. Advanced players may wish to discard darts thrown outside of the 25 and continue to throw until one player finishes inside the 25 or bullseye and closer than their opponent.
Players take the score each throw (three darts) away from their score until they can finish on a double - the only way to win. To win the game a player must hit a double or the bullseye if they require 50. For example, if a player has 40 left, they can win by hitting double 20.
ADVERTISEMENT
If a player scores more than they have remaining on their total, they have bust their score and remain on that score until their next throw.
This format is well suited to being played in sets such as best of or first to three legs or five legs.
Halve it
Halve it is a great game to play in a group and can again be tailored to suit the level of player taking part.
The idea is simple - players must hit a predetermined set of targets to score points but if they miss a target with all three darts in a throw their score is halved.
ADVERTISEMENT
Prior to the game players will decide how many targets and which targets will be used for the game. Anywhere between five and ten targets works well but players can choose as many or as little as is preferred.
Targets can be harder or easier depending on how tough players want the game to be - you could choose to have the whole section of a certain number or something as specific as a treble.
Scoring areas aren’t the only type of target that could be introduced. Consider adding in targets of hitting three separate colours in three darts or scoring an exact score in three darts - for example 41.
Generally, players choose targets that offer easier scoring opportunities for the opening throws to give players a chance to build up a score before moving to harder targets.
After all players have thrown for each target the winner is the player with the highest score.
ADVERTISEMENT
Killer
The game of Killer is ideal for groups of players of all abilities and is easily understood.
At the beginning of the game each player starts with three or five lives and is randomly allocated a number on the board. The allocation can be done in a range of ways from drawing number from a hat to throwing a dart with the weaker hand to determine which number a player will have.
Once all players have a number the objective of the game is to remove all of your opponent’s lives by hitting their numbers before you lose all of your own lives.
The order of throw can be determined through ‘nearest the bull’ and in its simplest form there really isn’t any more to it than that.
ADVERTISEMENT
As with all of these games there are further rules that players can introduce to vary the difficulty and strategy of the game.
For example, rather than counting the whole number section as a single and removing one life, players could make doubles worth two lives and trebles worth three lives. This adds an incentive for aiming at the tougher targets.
Players could also decide that before being able to take lives off their opponents scores, they must become a killer themselves. To do this players would have to hit their own number three times before throwing for their opponent’s.
Which games are you playing while in isolation? Let us know on Facebook.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026





